Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jim on January 2, 2011 at 17:29

No activity according to SONRIS.

 

Well Information

Review Well Information

WELLS

SERIAL	WELL NAME	WELL NUM	ORG ID	FIELD	PARISH	PROD TYPE	SEC	TWN	RGE	EFFECTIVE DATE	API NUM
241556	HA RA SUWW;MERIWETHER 24H	001	P251	2872	43	00	025	09N	13W	10/18/2010	17085222050000

PRMT DATE	SPUD DATE	STAT DATE	ST CD
06/18/2010	06/18/2010	01

WELL SURFACE COORDINATES

Surface Longitude	Surface Latitude	Lambert X	Lambert Y	Ground Elevation	Zone	Datum
93-39-24.829	31-44-33.849	1640374	393335	261.2	N	NAD-27

WELL SURFACE COORDINATES GENERATED BY DNR

UTMX 83	UTMY 83	LONGITUDE 83	LATITUDE 83
437762.36246105	3512127.06146911	-93.65707735	31.74290564

BOTTOM HOLE COORD

EFFECTIVE DATE	END DATE	PLUGBACK TOTAL DEPTH	TRUE VERTICAL DEPTH	MEASURED DEPTH	LAT DEG	LAT MIN	LAT SEC	LONG DEG	LONG MIN	LONG SEC	COORDINATE SOURCE	LAMBERT X	LAMBERT Y	ZONE	COORDINATE SYSTEM
06/18/2010	12151	17434	31	44	38.959	93	39	4.094	02	1642169	393832	N	01
06/18/2010	12151	17434	31	44	39.571	93	39	4.748	02	2922954	454539	N	02

WELL HISTORY

SERIAL	WELL NAME	WELL NUM	ORG ID	FIELD	ST CD	PT	WELL CLASS	EFF DATE	END DATE	STAT DATE
241556	HA RA SUWW;MERIWETHER 24H	001	P251	2872	01	00	10/18/2010	06/18/2010
241556	HA RA SUWW;WRIGHT FAMILY 24 H	001	P251	2872	01	00	06/18/2010	10/17/2010	06/18/2010

SCOUT INFO

REPORT DATE	WELL STATUS	MEASURED DEPTH	TRUE VERT DEPTH	DETAIL
06/18/2010	01	17434	200' FSL & 1890' FEL OF SEC 13. PBHL: 250' FSL & 1890' FEL OF SEC 24.

PERFORATIONS

SERIAL NUM	COMPLETION DATE	UPPER PERF	LOWER PERF	SANDS	RESERVOIR

WELL TESTS

RPT TYP	TEST DATE	RPT DATE	OIL POT	COND	GAS DEL	WATER	BSW%	FLOW PRES	SHUTIN PRES	CHOKE	UPPER PERF	LOWER PERF	BOT HOLE PRES

WELL ALLOWABLES

EFFECTIVE DATE	END DATE	LUW CODE	LUW TYPE CODE	ALLOWABLE	ESTIMATED POTENTIAL	CURRENT ALLOWABLE TYPE

LEASE\UNIT\WELL PRODUCTION

RPT DATE	LUW CODE	STORAGE FAC	DOC USE	WELL CNT	OPENING STK	OIL PROD(BBL)	GAS PROD(MCF)	DISPOSITION	CLOSING STK	PARISH

CASING

COMPLETION DATE	CASING SIZE	WELLBORE SIZE	CASING WEIGHT	UPPER SET DEPTH	LOWER SET DEPTH	CEMENT SACKS	TEST PRESSURE	HOURS UNDER PRESSURE	TEST DATE	CASING PULLED	CREATION PROCESS

PLUG AND ABANDON

P and A DATE	LOCATION TYPE	CASING CUT TYPE	CASING CUT DEPTH	MUD WEIGHT LEFT	COMMENTS

PLUGS

PLUG TYPE	UPPER PLUG DEPTH	LOWER PLUG DEPTH	SACKS OF CEMENT	SLURRY WEIGHT

TUBING AND PACKERS

COMPLETION DATE	TUBING SIZE	TUBING LOWER DEPTH	TUBING UPPER DEPTH	PACKER DEPTH

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Krystal on January 4, 2011 at 5:09

So does this mean that they have already drilled a well, or that they plan to drill? 

 

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on January 4, 2011 at 5:18

Krystal, there is no Haynesville Shale well yet permitted to be completed in Section 25.  The following well is proposed to have a surface location in Section 25 but will be drilled into and produced from Section 24.  So only the mineral owners in Section 24 will share in the production.  

 

Petrohawk, Meriwether 24 #H1 Well, Serial #241556, S25(24)-T9N-R13W

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Krystal on January 4, 2011 at 5:23

Ok, thanks for the info

 

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Henry on January 3, 2011 at 0:49

Isn't this the section on which both Petrohawk and Chesapeake applied for unit applications?  I have no idea how it was resolved.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on January 3, 2011 at 3:48

Chesapeake and Exxon Mobil both have applications pending for Section 33.  I have 25 as a Petrohawk unit, Docket #10-946 from the Sept. 14 hearing date approved as Field Order 501-G-29 of the Converse Field.

• ▶ Reply