Is it correct that wells must not be closer than 500 ft from any private structures or is that just occupied structures like homes?
If so, would that mean that after a well is drilled, no one would be allowed to build a building that would be closer than 500 ft from a well?
And if that's so, would the drilling company need to have permission from a land owner if their property was within that 500 ft although the well was not being drilled on that property?

Views: 342

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

P.G., a good question. This law is provided in R.S. 30:28. Here is how it goes- To drill a well the applicant submits an application to the Commissioner of Conservation, including a certified well location plat. The Commissioner notices whether there are any residential or commercial structures not owned by the applicant located within 500-feet of the proposed drilling site. (The 500-foot rule only applies to wells to be drilled deeper than 10,000 feet, which certainly applies to the HA wells). If so, the Commissioner notifies the owner of such structure and provides ten days for such owner to request a hearing on the matter. If a hearing is held, the Commissioner decides whether to issue the permit, or deny, based on testimony at the hearing. If no hearing is requested, none is held, and the Drilling Permit is normally issued. The owner of the residential or commercial structure may give permission for the well to be drilled, as proposed. The law does not address subsequent construction of a dwelling within 500-feet of the existing well. And finally, yes, any owner of a residential or commercial structure would be afforded the opportunity for a hearing as described above, regardless of whose property the well is proposed to be drilled. Hope this helps.
Thanks for your explanation.
My concern is if a HA well is drilled on an adjacent property (not yours), would that be considered an encroachment on your property, (the portion within the 500 ft radius) considering the 500 foot limitation?
If so, it would limit your use of your property.
No. R.S. 30:28 only relates to the distance between a well and a residential or commercial structure. "Property lines" are not considered.
The set back requirement is applicable regardless of whether the well surface location is off tract or not. The setback is 500' for inhabited dwellings and 300' for non-inhabited. They must be 500' from your house or business but only 300' from a barn or out-building.
That setback requirement being when considering placement of the well, I would assume the same for a land owner thinking of building a structure near an existing well.
The reason I mention property lines is that since the owner of the property with the well site likely got compensated for the well site. It would seem only fair the adjacent property owner should be compensated should that well's location restrict the use of his property.
No, the R.S. 30:28 statute does not place restrictions on building structures after the well is drilled.
Okay, that's what I was concerned about..

How far would the set back location of a NG well have to be from a private land owner's water well? Our water well is located at the old homeplace (the old house was recently torn down) and our residence is actually a little farther away from there. Surveyors have marked off a location in an adjoining section and I am not yet sure how far the well location is from our water well.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service