Received call from  2companiies wanted to lease land in Natchitoches area.  One is Tall Pines? Other GEP Il LLC.  But I understand its Expand they want to sell leases to so why doesn’t Expand just direct negotiation??

  One section of my land is  

Lands in Section 9, Township 8N, Range 8W.   Thanks if any have info.  j

Views: 669

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Carol, Expand almost never leases themselves.  They hire land companies like Tall Pines.  Expand and all major O&G companies do not employ enough corporate landmen to handle large leasing efforts.  It's enough that you know that if you lease to Tall Pines Expand is highly likely to be drilling the wells that include your minerals.  If you lease to GEPH II, they will likely drill your wells.  I say likely because operators often swap leases because they prefer to drill their own operated units as opposed to being a non-op working interest in wells drilled by some other company.

Your area is a major step out from the currently defined Haynesville Shale fairway.  And it is good to have both Expand and GEPH II competing for your lease.  Competition always benefits the mineral owner.  Take your time, get experienced help and make the best lease you can.  You and your heirs will live with it for the next thirty years.  Good luck.

Thanks Skip. I just happen to have a relative that is a lawyer in the gas and oil business and he is currently looking over the lease thus I will get his feedback asap with any suggestions on changes or red flags nice bonus offered too

You're welcome, Carol. Good luck.

Carol, if you are looking for feedback from other Natchitoches mineral owners or would care to share what you are learning, I suggest that you post a discussion in the Natchitoches Group.  When we are dealing with location specific issues, the groups are the best place to get and to share information.  Here is a link to the group below. You would have to join the group to be able to post a discussion.  When someone replies in a discussion or chooses to "follow" the discussion they will get an email letting them know each time someone replies in that discussion thread.  It works quite well.

https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/group/natchitochesparishnetwork

Tall Pine has been leasing in this general area for several months. While it hasn't been confirmed publicly, I am confident that Tall Pine is leasing on behalf of GEP II. When I last searched the Natchitoches Parish courthouse last week, Tall Pine has filed ~10,250 acres of new leases in this general area.  The sections highlighted in green on the map below are the sections where leases have been filed in the courthouse.  Your minerals (section highlighted in purple) are a bit of a step out to the East from their other leases, which is a big step out from the "legacy" Hayneville play.  You can see the existing Haynesville and Mid-Bossier wells to the West of the green acreage block on the map below.  GEP filed an order for a Haynesville well in Section 22&27-9N-9W, and the hearing is scheduled for September 3, 2025.  This is a big step out, so I am not sure what their plan is.

Ryan, could the leasing in this area be in search of the eastern extent of the Western Haynesville Play?  The step out distances are surprising for the "Legacy Haynesville".  Are you aware if any seismic has been shot in this area?

That is a great question Skip. I have no idea. I think there is seismic in this area, but I am not certain of that. I'm very curious what the results of the first well look like out here.

GEPH II permits the first Robeline Field well.

WELLS

SERIAL WELL NAME WELL NUM ORG ID FIELD PARISH PROD TYPE SEC TWN RGE EFFECTIVE DATE API NUM
255326 ROBELINE 001 G8906 7734 35 00 027 09N 09W 09/12/2025 17069205480000
PRMT DATE SPUD DATE STAT DATE ST CD
09/12/2025 09/12/2025 01

WELL SURFACE COORDINATES

Surface Longitude Surface Latitude Lambert X Lambert Y Ground Elevation Zone Datum
0-0-0 0-0-0 1756694 387949 192 N NAD-27

WELL SURFACE COORDINATES GENERATED BY DENR

UTMX 83 UTMY 83 LONGITUDE 83 LATITUDE 83
473212.84942101 3510652.17380814 -93.28277289 31.73097928 View GIS

BOTTOM HOLE COORD

EFFECTIVE DATE END DATE PLUGBACK TOTAL DEPTH TRUE VERTICAL DEPTH MEASURED DEPTH LAT DEG LAT MIN LAT SEC LONG DEG LONG MIN LONG SEC COORDINATE SOURCE LAMBERT X LAMBERT Y ZONE COORDINATE SYSTEM
09/12/2025 17000 26000 1757079 387608 N 01

WELL HISTORY

SERIAL WELL NAME WELL NUM ORG ID FIELD ST CD PT WELL CLASS EFF DATE END DATE STAT DATE
255326 ROBELINE 001 G8906 7734 01 00 09/12/2025 09/12/2025

SCOUT INFO

REPORT DATE WELL STATUS MEASURED DEPTH TRUE VERT DEPTH DETAIL
09/12/2025 01 26000 996' FSL & 1571' FWL SEC 27, T09N-R09W. PBHL: 660' FSL & 1960' FWL SEC 27, T09N-R09W.

It looks like they permitted a mostly vertical well. I suspect they will potentially core a portion or the whole zone of interest and run a full suite of logs to characterize the reservoir. GEP has a rig drilling in 12N-09W at the current time. On September 10, they were at a depth of 8,605'. Perhaps they will move that rig to this location when they are finished with the current well. Their field order application for this area covered Sections 2 and 27.

I noticed no "H" in the well name but a TVD and MD that indicated a permit for a horizontal well.  I've asked my contacts with the OOC about that.  GEP Haynesville can always plug and abandon the well if they do not find what they are looking for in the vertical.

Also possible that vertical well is drilled to get "science" data - but they release the rig after the vertical to evaluate the info from vertical well.

Core and other analyses is not an overnight analytical process - need time

Then - if things are there to support the lateral - move in rig at later date and drill the Horizontal

I agree. I think this will be the path they take. This is a big step-out, and I am sure they will want to gather and evaluate as much data as possible before deciding to drill a horizontal.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments

Not a member? Get our email.



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service