"Short Section" Experience?
Curious if anyone has had experience dealing with a proposed "short section"? Just got an ALT well notice that Vine is asking for CUL's that only take in half of our section. I suspect that the east / west lateral that Encana drilled in the same section has something to do with this. Thanks.
Views: 193
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on -
A lot of CUL's include less than a full section. IMO well designs are often based on the perceived optimal lateral length and existing surface locations. The state approved production allocation formula does not mandate a minimum linear perforated lateral length in a section.
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??
In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of) nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.
This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…
ContinuePosted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
Bienville Parish, LA
246 members
-
North Caddo Parish
359 members
-
Cass County, TX
121 members
-
Nacogdoches County
193 members
-
Claiborne Parish
146 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Rapides Parish
101 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
150 members
-
Harrison County
166 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
9 members
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
