Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by bigball N1/N2 on February 5, 2010 at 10:12

Skip,

Im assuming there is not enough info. to know anything about the Powhatten area. I know a lot of people who were leased in the area in '08, but havent heard much else since then. Would love your take on that area. Thanks for all the knowledge

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 5, 2010 at 16:19

BB, the drilling is gradually headed southeast. Two wells are currently drilling just to the northwest and another is permitted but not drilled. The Lysander Webb well has already been drilled:

Ensign #150 Rig, EnCana, John Mondello 29 #H1 Well, Serial #240253, S29-T11N-R9W
Trinidad #112 Rig, EnCana, Virginia Webb 13 #H1 Well, Serial #240624, S13-T11N-R10W

EnCana, Lysander Webb 11 #H1 Well, Serial #240321, S11-T11N-R10W
EnCana, TJ Kervin 24 #H1 Well, Serial #240407, S24-T11N-R10W

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by bigball N1/N2 on February 5, 2010 at 17:27

Les,

Thanks, I guess that it a good sign. Hopefully they will keep coming right down hwy 1.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by buckmaster on February 5, 2010 at 16:07

skip i noticed you have ten units for 11-11 ionly come up with nine 1-12-16-19-27-28-30-31-32-. i ck hearings by field every day. gis access map isnt much help they are way behind.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by buckmaster on February 5, 2010 at 16:07

skip i noticed you have ten units for 11-11 ionly come up with nine 1-12-16-19-27-28-30-31-32-. i ck hearings by field every day. gis access map isnt much help they are way behind.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 5, 2010 at 16:51

buckmaster, the unit apps and orders that I have for 11N - 11W are as follows:

Sections 1,12 to Samson Contour.
Sections 4,16,27,28 to Petrohawk.
Sections 19,30,31 to SWEPI.
Section 32 to Chesapeake.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by buckmaster on February 5, 2010 at 17:17

thanks skip appreciate every bodys help

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by J lutty on February 6, 2010 at 16:20

SKIP-

I ENJOY AND VALUE YOUR INPUT, DO YOU HAVE ANY NEW INFO FOR THE AREA BETWEEN AJAX AND MARTHAVILLE? (9N-10W)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 6, 2010 at 17:27

JL, that area has four (4) Haynesville Units but no permitted Haynesville Shale wells:

S22-T9N-R10W, HA RA SUI Unit, EnCana, San Miguel Creek Field, Natchitoches Parish
S23-T9N-R10W, HA RA SUJ Unit, EnCana, San Miguel Creek Field, Natchitoches Parish
S26-T9N-R10W, HA RA SUK Unit, EnCana, San Miguel Creek Field, Natchitoches Parish
S27-T9N-R10W, HA RA SUL Unit, EnCana, San Miguel Creek Field, Natchitoches Parish

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 6, 2010 at 17:42

JL. If I fail to respond to your question, or those of other members, please take it as I concur with Les B.s responses and have nothing further to add.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by olddog573 on February 7, 2010 at 6:54

Heres two more Samson applications for you. Hosston, Cotton Valley and Haynesville.

Attachments:

• s11t11r11.JPG, 203 KB
• s19t11r10.JPG, 204 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 7, 2010 at 7:04

Thanks, olddog. I will add these Samson Units when they appear on the Commissioner's public hearing schedule. In order for an application to be included on that schedule it must have successfully completed the pre-app stage either through holding a local hearing or having the notice period pass without a person or corporation on the IP list formally requesting a local hearing. Once past the pre-app process, it is rare for an application to be rejected.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• Next ›
• Page