Texas Haynesville Shale - Well Hall of Fame (8/7/09)

This is a separate HS Well HOF for Texas only due to the lower initial production rates. The list includes wells that had an initial rate of at least 8 MMcfd.






#1) 13418 Mcfd - Common Resources, Red River 164 #1 Well, San Augustine County, Serial #673779
#2) 11400 Mcfd - Penn Virginia, Steele Gas Unit No.1 #2H Well, Harrison County, Serial #679027 
#3) 10438 Mcfd - Samson, Riley Trust #2H Well, Harrison County, Serial #673858 
#4) 9657 Mcfd - Petrohawk, Stratocaster GU #1H Well, Harrison County
#5) 9632 Mcfd - Penn Virginia, James Madison Furrh Gas Unit #2H Well, Panola  County, Serial #679300 
#6) 9400 Mcfd - GMX Resources, Blocker Heirs #12H Well, Harrison County, Serial #678665 
#7) 9300 Mcfd - Goodrich, Taylor Sealey #3H Well, Panola County, Serial #677325 
#8) 9300 Mcfd - GMX Resources, K #5H Well (Holt #1H), Harrison County, Serial #669516 
#9) 9200 Mcfd - GMX Resources, Baldwin #14H Well, Harrison County, Serial #666547 
#10) 9164 Mcfd - Samson, Woodley Gu 1 #2H Well, Harrison County, Serial #672217 
#11) 9000 Mcfd - Goodrich, Lutheran Church 5 #5HR Well, Panola County, Serial #678049 
#12) 8900 Mcfd - GMX Resources, Blocker Ware #19H Well, Harrison County, Serial #674995 
#13) 8897 Mcfd - Samson, Minnie Bell Gas Unit #3H Well, Panola County, Serial #676845 
#14) 8700 Mcfd - GMX Resources, Baldwin #17H Well, Harrison County, Serial #673260 
#15) 8500 Mcfd - GMX Resources, Verhalen A #2H Well, Harrison County, Serial #677086 
#16) 8500 Mcfd - XTO, New Horizons #1H Well, Panola County, Serial #668383 
#17) 8500 Mcfd - Comstock, Woods "H" #1H Well, Harrison County
#18) 8200 Mcfd - Comstock, Cox "H" #1H Well, Harrison County, Serial #678970 
#19) 8000 Mcfd - Penn Virginia, Fogle Gas Unit #5H Well, Harrison County, Serial #654152 
#20) 8000 Mcfd - El Paso, Travis Lynch GU #4H Well

Views: 113

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on August 16, 2009 at 16:45
Bump
Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on August 16, 2009 at 17:15
Dang good wells. Thanks for the info.
Permalink Reply by Mark on August 17, 2009 at 4:22
Both 5 and 6 are PVA James Madison Furrh 2H wells at ~9.6 mmcfd but different counties. Typo?

Also, I believe the #9 GMXR K5H wells name has been changed to Holt #1H, but I can't remember where I got that from to verify it.
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on August 17, 2009 at 4:47
Mark, the JM Furrh 2H was a duplicate - thanks for the catch. Yes, GMXR noted the name change to the Holt #1H. Because the TRRC still has the original name I will add the information in brackets.
Permalink Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm on August 17, 2009 at 6:41
Be careful there lethal!! Whispers are that the IP's are lower on the Texas side but the declines are flatter in the first year. Would mean same volume produced over first 18 months, just La. wells get a lot more in first 6 months, Texas wells get more in months 12-18. Only time (and data!) will tell!

But at this point, crappy gas prices are hurting us all!
Permalink Reply by ALongview on August 17, 2009 at 10:14
The Red River well in San Augustine was reported as a 72 hr. test as well.
Permalink Reply by RBH on September 22, 2009 at 7:42
Thanks. Any additional info out of shelby, san augustine or Nacogdoches...hear of any activity in Angelina
Permalink Reply by om28v on September 22, 2009 at 16:58
I see on the gis map a San Augustine well that ip'd @ 20.3mm if i'm not wrong. api 405-30249 timberstar-mills b. It is a james lime well so i suppose this is for HS wells only? do we need a james lime hall of fame? or was that for the entire mo. of March '09 not the ip? Sorry new here.
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on September 22, 2009 at 17:09
Probably not since that was a 72 hr. test. If you look below that figure (under "Volume") you find 6726 mcf/day. Still a good well, though.
Permalink Reply by Michael Barry on September 23, 2009 at 4:15
there is a JV between HK and EOG in East Teexas involving the HS and the Bossier which they consider a distinct separate reservoir. Any well results that anyone knows about? Thanks.
Permalink Reply by RBH on September 23, 2009 at 16:51
SEEMS LIKE MOST OF ACREAGE IS IN NAC--MENTION OF GAMMAGE #1H AND HILL #1H COMPLETED IN NAC BLOG WITH HIGH RATES THROUGH SCOUTS --BUT NO COMPLETION REPORTS FILED-DRILLING ON TWO OTHERS NOW POP-POP AND HASSELL
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 23, 2009 at 11:20
WB, yes and other primary sources.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Top Content 

1 Looking Back At The Haynesville Shale - A Retrospective

Looking Back At The Haynesville Shale - A Retrospective
2 Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings

Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings
3 Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play

Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play
4 Aethon looks for Buyers of its Haynesville Assets

Aethon looks for Buyers of its Haynesville Assets
5 Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.

Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.
6 Comstock October Presentation

Comstock October Presentation
7 Haynesville Has 12.5 Years of Sub-$3 NatGas Inventory - Enverus

Haynesville Has 12.5 Years of Sub-$3 NatGas Inventory - Enverus

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service