I see that Samson moved the well location of the the #1 and cancelled the permit for #2. They were permitted to be drilled on the same location as the revolution. Any ideas on what this means and why they would do that? Is it because the revolution did not make a good well? It was just completed in the last few weeks.   

Views: 33

Replies to This Discussion

btj, I believe it had more to do with the off-lease surface locations for these wells.  The unit plat was amended to include the off-lease surface location acreage in the unit.  It just eliminated some headaches.  The 2H was canceled to avoid a conflict in the locations of the two wells, according to the notes at the bottom of the amendment W-1.  I don't think any of this was influenced by Revolution.
Thanks jeffree1. That makes sense. I didn't understand what was going on.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of)  nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.

This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…

Continue

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service