Samson Michelle #1 and 2
I see that Samson moved the well location of the the #1 and cancelled the permit for #2. They were permitted to be drilled on the same location as the revolution. Any ideas on what this means and why they would do that? Is it because the revolution did not make a good well? It was just completed in the last few weeks.
Views: 30
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on
-
btj, I believe it had more to do with the off-lease surface locations for these wells. The unit plat was amended to include the off-lease surface location acreage in the unit. It just eliminated some headaches. The 2H was canceled to avoid a conflict in the locations of the two wells, according to the notes at the bottom of the amendment W-1. I don't think any of this was influenced by Revolution.
-
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
