All things about Austin Chalk in Louisiana: Horizontal drilling, improved seismic testing, and liner casing are offering hope for the deep minerals in the Austin Chalk which runs from Austin, Texas through parts of Louisiana to Biloxi Mississippi.
Location: Vernon-Rapides-Avoyelles-StLandry-PtCoupee-Florida parishes
Members: 259
Latest Activity: Aug 3, 2022
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Aug 3, 2022.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Rock Man Jul 8, 2022.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Rock Man Mar 8, 2022.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Roger Boehme Jan 22, 2022.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Rock Man Aug 9, 2021.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Rock Man Mar 17, 2021.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Rock Man Feb 17, 2021.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Jan 27, 2021.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by David Crockett Nov 28, 2020.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Jul 9, 2020.
Started by Diamond Jim. Last reply by Rock Man Jul 6, 2020.
Started by Lisa Melder-Johnson Feb 21, 2020.
Started by Diamond Jim. Last reply by Rock Man Feb 10, 2020.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Lisa Melder-Johnson Jan 29, 2020.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Darrell Blanchard Jan 19, 2020.
Add a Comment
What we don't know (and never will know) are the details of the monthly production over time. Water rates, choke sizes, etc. Believe me, if the rates were such on this well that it was still economic, the well would not be shut in.
The IP rate works out to a 5.9% oil cut (210 BO & 3343 BW). If the same oil to water ratio was maintained, the 1000 BOPD rate would equate to almost 17,000 BW per day. The unknown facts are the key to understanding what is doing on here.
Allowables, as far as I know, are based on state flow tests. There is no DT-1 test entered in the SONRIS Well File so I think that test would look much like the IP data:
COMPLETED 1/21/2020 AS AN OIL WELL W/ 210 BOPD; 1650 MCFD; 8200 FTP; 6063 SITP; 1300 CP; 18/64" CK; 3343 BWPD; 94% BS&W; 7857; GVTY 52 API; PERF: 16,157'-22,372'
Without a DT-1 date it is impossible to know how soon the test was done after the well was allowed to flow into a sales line. So did oil and gas flow improve because the well "cleaned up" over time? The lateral is 6215 linear feet.
I also saw on this well that they have posted an allowable and an estimated potential for July. Does that mean they have opened the well back up. There weren’t any allowable posted since March until the one for July.
Looks correct, hope it is at 1000 barrels a day for February ( a 28 day period). If the reported volume is correct, it makes the recent work order on the LM 3H seem a little puzzling.
WORK PERMITS
REFERENCE NUMBER | APPLICATION DATE | EXPIRATION DATE | WORK PERMIT TYPE | WORK PERMIT STATUS | WORK PERMIT STATUS_DATE | TOTAL DEPTH | WORK_PERFORMED | DOCUMENTATION RECEIPT DATE | TEST SAND | WORK DESCRIPTION |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-034 | 03/10/2020 | 03/10/2021 | PLUG AND ABANDON | VERBAL | 03/11/2020 | 0 | N | TEMPORARILY ABANDON | TA WELL. SET EZSV @ 14,242'. SQZ 86.4 BBLS BLW EZSV & LEAVE 3.6 BBLS ON TOP. SET BP @ 5300' & LEAVE 200' CMT ON TOP. SET BP @ 500' & SET 100' CMT ON TOP. N/D BOP & LEAVE WH IN PLACE. |
just reviewed production numbers on Crowell #2 on Sonris. are those real?
02/01/2020
oil 28025
gas 202968
RPT DATE LUW CODE STORAGE FAC DOC USE WELL CNT OPENING STK OIL PROD(BBL) GAS PROD(MCF) DISPOSITION CLOSING STK PARISH
02/01/2020 052211 1 1530 28025 202968 27795 1760 RAPIDES
01/01/2020 052211 1 0 6011 47298 4481 1530 RAPIDES
CASING
By "cooler" I wonder if this was a surface unit to remove NGL's from gas stream via refrigeration approach (e.g. JT Unit). Having only 5 bbls (slightly over 200 gallons) of "spill" not a big deal based on my oilfield experiences. To temporarily abandon the wellbore because of this doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I may be missing something.
I see that on the crowell lm 30H Number 2 the cooler erupted at the well site during maintennce operations and discharged what appears to be less than 5 bbls of e&p waste (mist of crude oil and sw) to a wooded area behind the location.
so they had a verbal agreement to temporarily abandon the well set CIBP @ 14,800 feet dump 20-30' cmt on top run tubing hanger with 2 way check valve in wellbore close in manual and hydraulic 5 1/8" valves above wellhead monitor well pressure
probably no big deal, but i don't know
Thanks RM. will be interesting to find out
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com
You need to be a member of Austin Chalk to add comments!