Replies to This Discussion

landownerPermalink Reply by Henry on December 14, 2009 at 13:46

Harley,
I'm wondering too.

Permalink Reply by OLD HILLBILLY on December 15, 2009 at 0:30

could it be the last name on the lease or maybe because some of the lease holders stired a little stink about being put into a large unit? just my feelings

landownerPermalink Reply by Henry on December 15, 2009 at 2:22

Old Hillbilly,
I'm not sure I understand your answer. Can you elaborate? Thanks.

Permalink Reply by Foxiecajun on December 15, 2009 at 3:34

LOL you thinking we did it? Or maybe it will take a long time to pay the hold outs hu? Wonder if Sec 19 and Sec 9 had the same problems? With a hold out? For sure they didnt have the STINK for a larger unit.

landownerPermalink Reply by Henry on December 15, 2009 at 4:41

Old Hillbilly (and Foxiecajun),
Call me stupid, but I still don't get your point. What's going on?

landownerPermalink Reply by harley on December 16, 2009 at 11:34

Thank you very much Shale Geo for this information. Do you think they got into the Bossier shale on these lower production wells? Thanks again for any info.

Permalink Reply by NA on December 16, 2009 at 14:26

I think this goes back to the geology. The coval well you list is 4 to 5 miles south west of the section nine area that was originally discussed in another post. Something interesting though is the coval well is close to the well in section 27, t11n r15w which would help to explain why they may experience higher ips further south.

Something I noticed about the CHK map you posted is the dip to the east towards the logansport field. A little further east of that dip is the section 9 area. Is it possible this area has a better bossier possibility.

landownerPermalink Reply by harley on December 16, 2009 at 16:26

Thanks NA for the input

landownerPermalink Reply by Lou Lou from LA on December 15, 2009 at 5:46

This is an excellent question. Why don't you take this to the main site and see if a geologist or and ole- timer in the field might have some thoughts on the matter. I'm sure that many in this 11-15 area want to know why . I'm in sec 22 and waiting to see if #2 well is going to be this low . Another question would be why so much water from the sec. 20 well.

landownerPermalink Reply by harley on December 15, 2009 at 6:19

Lou I am in Sec 22 also. Section 27 next to us did real well. Only time will tell if the second well will be decent.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Ajo Hebert on December 20, 2009 at 16:51

Maybe because they do not have the seismic data yet> Too many surface owners are holding out for 10
bucks and too many mineral owners are crying " what's in it for me?". Well the answer seems to be low royality payments due to low production. Maybe they missed the sweet spot. Sign the seismic permit.