Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by George Willey on April 11, 2011 at 8:02

Skip,

It was reported to me that the rig in 17-10-10 (Faye Benning) drilled into a salt dome at around 6000 feet and they subsequently moved the rig over about 40 feet and started drilling again.  Does this sound feasible and are salt domes a common problem in drilling Haynesville Shale wells?

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on April 11, 2011 at 8:22

George, it appears the original well encountered salt water in a shallower formation (Sligo) that caused the well to be P&A'd rather than a salt dome.  The replacement well will be drilled with a mud system that will allow drilling thru the problem formation and will have a proposed lateral virtually identical to the original well.  The surface location of the replacement well is 36 ft from the original.  

Permalink Reply by George Willey on April 22, 2011 at 10:32

Any word on how this well is going since they moved it and started over?

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on April 22, 2011 at 10:40

George, the well should have spud near the 1st of April but unfortunately there is no information being posted in Sonris.

 

 

Permalink Reply by George Willey on April 22, 2011 at 11:38

Do you know if the drilling rig is still on location?

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on April 22, 2011 at 11:44

George, I am not sure if a rig is on location.

Permalink Reply by Steve on February 26, 2011 at 4:16

That's typical.   They'll bring in a frac stac (one of the larger christmas trees) before completing the well.  Concerning the Samson well:  Attached is a copy of the state potential report.  This area could be heating up.

Attachments:

• Blue 8H-1 Potential Report.pdf, 472 KB

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on March 1, 2011 at 4:04

Bob, as Steve said, you do not need a Christmas tree until the well is fracture stimulated and completed. 

Permalink Reply by SOLAOGA on March 25, 2011 at 15:24

Heard that this well ran into some faults and was disappointing.

Permalink Reply by Shaye on March 24, 2011 at 10:38

Steve, I notice in the Samson well report that "gas" is listed as the product as opposed to "dry gas" - what, if any, significance does this have for the area?

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on March 29, 2011 at 3:10

Shaye, no significance since operator's almost report as "gas".

Permalink Reply by Shaye on March 25, 2011 at 16:21

If I am reading Sonris correctly, it appears as of February 28 the XTO well in section 28 was temporarily plugged and abandoned due to a stuck pipe.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 12
• Next ›
• Page