Started this discussion. Last reply by Martin Sep 4, 2009.
Started this discussion. Last reply by herefordsnshale Apr 3, 2009.
Started this discussion. Last reply by herefordsnshale Mar 27, 2009.
68 members
478 members
194 members
11 members
405 members
18 members
250 members
457 members
11 members
388 members
Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
Comment Wall (41 comments)
You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!
Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com
landownerfox said…
landownerLinda V said…
JRV and I will be out with out Teryx Sun morning to ride our trails on the property. If you see us (White pickup King ranch and flatbed give us a shout. Thanks.LLV
landownerLinda V said…
landownerLinda V said…
J & L
landownerlanadan Ds3 said…
Despite all the efforts of most of the decent, sincere people in Section 20 pointing out that it is simply not FAIR to the mineral owners of that section to decrease their revenue stream by putting 29 in with 20, and that there IS ample acreage in 29 for a well site, the Commish did exactly that "on the spot".
No one HAS YET been able to come up with an explanation of just how the well in the S/E corner of 20 is going to " . . . economically and efficiently . . . " drain gas in 29 when THE LATERAL GOES DIRECTLY NORTH AWAY FROM 29 !
Good ole Louisiana politics ! "Dem dat gots the gold -- makes de rules !"
In short -- the fix was in befort the sun came up on the Hearing day !!
landownerfox said…
landownerfox said…
landownerBobi Carr ("parker") said…
You and your wife need to join us for some bowling.
Oil & Gas ProSkip Peel - Mineral Consultant said…
Oil & Gas ProTwo Dogs, Pirate said…
View All Comments