Replies to This Discussion

landownerPermalink Reply by BARBARA'S MA on December 14, 2009 at 10:03

Have received division orders, but title has not been cured yet. Then was told orders should not have been sent until title is cured, but to go ahead and sign mine anyway. Chesapeake is ok with keeping funds in suspension for "unlocatable heirs" even though they are aware aware heirship is in question. I am reluctant to sign order that does not have the correct amount of acreage. Any comments appreciated.

Permalink Reply by NA on December 15, 2009 at 15:53

Did they say what title problems they encountered in the section? I would figure most of the people have owned property in that section for decades.

Permalink Reply by Foxiecajun on November 11, 2009 at 14:48

Sorry but with a well drilled and waiting you are HBP.

landownerPermalink Reply by drilltheshale on November 30, 2009 at 11:06

If this is flowing, does anyone know the initial production rates on this well?

Permalink Reply by NA on December 10, 2009 at 10:10

Well potential 1,605 mcf per day

landownerPermalink Reply by drilltheshale on December 10, 2009 at 16:26

Wow, low.

landownerPermalink Reply by drilltheshale on December 10, 2009 at 16:29

Why isn't this on Sonris?

Permalink Reply by NA on December 10, 2009 at 17:17

Go on sonris lite. Do a well search by section, township, range. Click on the McCoy well. On this screen look for the area labeled well test. The Gas del column is what it potentialed at per day.

landownerPermalink Reply by drilltheshale on December 14, 2009 at 11:34

Thanks very much NA, I overlooked that.

Permalink Reply by NA on December 15, 2009 at 15:59

NP

you are right though low. I heard this through the grape vine but someone mentioned the geology wasn't that great in that area.

landownerPermalink Reply by Henry on December 16, 2009 at 2:12

NA,
If you look on sonris at #239084, the well in 27-11-15, you see a very good well -- 14,868 mcfe/day, with a good pressure. The geology cannot be all bad to make this well.

Permalink Reply by NA on December 16, 2009 at 5:24

How many other wells in T11N, R15W hit that kind of production? Also let me clarify a little. I was meaning the area around section 9. Look at sections 11,13,14,15 and possibley 10 when it comes online. All a far cry from the production figures in Section 27. I hope the geologist is wrong and they hit more of those section 27 wells. Unfortunately in the area of section 9 they haven't seen the numbers thus far

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page