Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by DJG on November 28, 2010 at 9:37

Just looked at the formation records in the completion report:

http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/CMPL/ogmappcontents/cmplcontents/pro...

Pay zone is listed at 12,500'

James Lime is listed at 6,850'

Travis Peak is listed at 7,925

Cotton Valley formation top is listed at 10,300'.

No other formations are listed.



To compare, CHK's Hezekiah well has the following formation depths listed on it's report:

BO: 11,847
HA: 12,652
Smackover: 12,776'


I'm curious if they might actually be producing from the Cotton Valley Lime (CVL) / Smackover at this location as it would generally be situated deeper than HA or BO.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on November 28, 2010 at 10:56

The field is so new that it was not on the proration schedule last month. What I wonder is whether they are including the shale intervals in this field? Hezekiah is nearly 5 miles northwest of Hall so the depth may change several feet in that distance and the HA could be even thinner. It will be more interesting to compare Hall to the Horton or Bengal wells when they come out.

Permalink Reply by Austin Eudaly on November 28, 2010 at 16:56

Does anyone know what the Hezekiah came on line at? Any data available on what it might be doing now?

Permalink Reply by GoRicky on November 29, 2010 at 6:42

First thing - I guess I miised the Hezekiah - what did it pot. @-? The Hall well is probably producing from a lime (whatever you call it - "Haynesville" or "CV"). I can't make DJG's link work. Is there an easy way to get to this info? I go to the GIS map, I
"Identify Wells", then to "Operator/Wellbore/PDQ" and all I see is:
"COMPLETION INFORMATION
No completion data found."

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on November 29, 2010 at 11:53

Search for completions here:

http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/CMPL/publicSearchAction.do?formData....

Use API # (leave out the hyphen) and leave all else blank to search for a specific well.

Hall has two reports. Hezekiah = 0

Permalink Reply by ken hatcher on November 29, 2010 at 12:08

Would a vertical decline at the same rate as the horizonals?

Permalink Reply by Jon Williamson on December 1, 2010 at 16:03

Ken

I think a vertical well decline is much slower.