Tags:
I leased to CHK but now SWEPI owns 50% and Encana owns 50% of my lease. I've been getting royalty checks from Encana for 5-6 months. SWEPI has me listed as a royalty owner and had already assigned me a royalty owner number when I called them.
I think SWEPI may be holding out on paying me royalties because I put language in my initial lease that said I reserve rights from the base of cotton valley to the surface.
I think maybe SWEPI knows the HS and BS are both present in my area and they will try to let the royalties they owe me build up to a large amount and then try to get me to sign an addendum that will grant them rights to more formations than what they got in the initial lease. They'll say just sign this and we'll give you the 20-30k in royalties we owe you. I'm not signing anything to alter my initial lease unless they pay me big bucks.
If that is the case I will just keep taking the checks from Encana and go UMI with SWEPI. Could I do that? Anyone ever heard of something like this happening?
I think it is something I have in my lease that is in my favor that they don't like. I think the issue holding up my SWEPI royalties is something in my favor they don't like.
Thanks,
Jack
Skip is correct but may be speaking more to development demands, the issue here is just about royalty being placed in pay - not a demand for development which is more complicated as described.
Good communication with the operator (or non-op payor SWEPI in this case) is the essential first step. If they choose to fail at that, then I would still stand by a proper certified/return receipt letter whether you want to classify it as a demand letter or not. This is because that documentation at an early date helps if you ever do want to address the issue in court. I would find it rare in this specific scenario that SWEPI not address it. I have handled this same scenario with them multiple times - all positive. I cannot say the same for other operators.
Don't forget that at this time you want to address any concerns as to non payment of royalties to your lessee, the lesee is ultimitly responsible NOT the Operator.
Encana has usually assigned SWEPI 50% in the subject lease, then each operate different units. Or that is the short version of their deal.
Most of these assignments seem to be of record so in that situation you can go stratight to SWEPI, but it never hurts to contact both and cc the other in any letters.
The situation Baron describes is different than Encana/Swepi, but is very common - where you are leased to a company and they are just in the unit but not operating. In some of those cases your Lessee may be getting paid by the operator, then paying you. You should always check for assignments of your lease first, then contact the Lessee of record and confirm they are the ones administering your royalty.
Office of Conservation requires that only actual well costs can be claimed. Invoices are required to back up the operators claimed cost. Therefore, Operators will, at the advice of Conservation, wait to apply until all associated costs are in, as the more they can add on to the application, the more they can save in severance.
And then it takes Consevation some time to review and approve the app.
I talked to shell about the severance tax. They are taking it out while they have an application with the state of LA for a refund. It appears that they have to pay taxes in until the state approves the well for a refund of the first two years. At that time they will refund the taxes that were taken out.
I guess encana doesn't want to deal with it so they don't take out the taxes in the first place.
Your dates are right. Shell mails on the last Thursday of the month. Encana is about a week earlier. (CHK is at the end)
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com