Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on December 14, 2010 at 17:15

KCM, you never sound like a dummy to me.

 

The red contour is for 15 porosity-feet (porosity times net thickness) and is Petrohawk's indication of what they believe is the better area of the field.  The productive area could extend to the 10 contour and beyond. 

Permalink Reply by kittycatmama on December 15, 2010 at 15:19

Les, you are kind. I do feel very ignorant when it comes to interpreting these shale maps. We have reserved minerals in Desoto, sections 7 and 18 of 14/14, section 21 of 14/15, and section 21 of 15/14, + a little in Shreveport. My main interest though is in the Desoto minerals. The Bossier Shale is very important as when these Haynesville wells deplete, then the Bossier will hopefully be there to take their place.

Permalink Reply by Bailey on January 24, 2011 at 8:17

We have minerals in 8 13/13.

Does this mean we potentially have Bossier in addition to the Haynesville Shale?

When do you think we will hear more about this?  Maybe after the Haynesville is HBP?

 

Permalink Reply by Parkdota on December 20, 2010 at 5:51

As a follow up to my initial post from Nov. 22nd I didn't touch on decline rates but after looking over the data I've noticed that sec 24 declined only roughly 70% and sec 9 is on pace to beat that.  Also, the mean of the other sections is better than the industry estimated norm.  So, maybe this is also a good reason for the activity.

Permalink Reply by kittycatmama on December 21, 2010 at 2:32

Parkdota, did you notice the production data for Sec. 4 just north of 9? Another super well--21500mcfd. When they did the east west lateral on that sec. in 2008, it was a crummy well, but with the north south one, it is great.

Permalink Reply by Parkdota on December 21, 2010 at 4:20

Yeah, I felt it would come in strong.  From what I can tell they have nearly all the wells drilled in sec 4 waiting to frac.  I'm guessing January they'll come in.  Sec 9 should be around a month there after.

Permalink Reply by David Bass on January 26, 2011 at 10:23

Can you clarify decline rate?  If production declined 70%,  then that would mean that if initial production was "100",  it would decline to produce "30".   Is that correct?  Thank you.

Permalink Reply by Parkdota on January 26, 2011 at 12:06

David, if a well produces 10 million cubic feet a day for the 1st month then according to most decline rates it would be around 2 mcf/day at the end of 12 months as 80-81% 1st year declines are the standard.  Some do better some do worse.

Permalink Reply by Parkdota on May 27, 2011 at 6:32

I got a letter today saying Encana is making application for 7 alternative unit wells in Holly Field sections 8, 17, & 22.  That should make some folks very happy.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on May 27, 2011 at 6:44

There are a number of sections 8, 17 & 22 in the Holly Field.  Got a township(s) to go with the sections?

Permalink Reply by Parkdota on May 27, 2011 at 7:28

14n 14w

Permalink Reply by Kay DS1 on May 27, 2011 at 7:31

This makes me (us) VERY happy.  :)

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 9
• Next ›
• Page