Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by MATT on May 30, 2019 at 8:25

Understood about the two additional wells.  Just read Kirks blog (after seeing Jay's post above).  Kirk is very thorough in his evaluation, comparison to the early 2000's soil/rock data are similar, but what I find interesting is the double fault crossings.  Obviously the faults are present based on the known "encountered losses" and lost circulation material, to resolve issue.  I have not seen any new reports posted on SONRIS since 3/21 to show what's being removed since tubing install.  Are the assumptions of water permeability through these faults warranted? or how likely is it that the water initially pulled was heavy on frac water side? and Conoco is sitting on McKowen 1 until Hebert and Erwin are closer to being online.   This is all new to me so I apologize if these are newby questions. Thks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark on May 30, 2019 at 8:38

I am a old long gone oil field hand. I was once a production Forman for Getty Oil and worked chalk wells in Snook Texas right outside College Station. We didn’t do directional drilling then and fracks were a third the size they use now so my knowledge of this is old and out dated. My family is from the Feliciana and 99% of what I hear and see is rumors. I am first related pretty closely to the land owner of EOG’s well in Norwood and have some limited first hand knowledge.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Craft on May 30, 2019 at 10:04

LEASE\UNIT\WELL PRODUCTION

RPT DATE	LUW CODE	STORAGE FAC	DOC USE	WELL CNT	OPENING STK	OIL PROD(BBL)	GAS PROD(MCF)	DISPOSITION	CLOSING STK	PARISH
03/01/2019	052137			1	0	1006	1715	0	1006	EAST FELICIANA

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Craft on May 30, 2019 at 10:05

From COP's McKowen.  Here's a link:

http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellinfo2...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on May 30, 2019 at 10:53

Great that we now have the first posting and hard data point for this well. Now to do the "watch" - i.e. let's see what the monthly production numbers are and more importantly what the next production test numbers look like as to all factors (O&G, choke, pressure, water).

The "patience dance" begins - and it is a slow one!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pat Butler on May 30, 2019 at 14:10

What hard data?  Is there something new?

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on May 30, 2019 at 16:52

"Hard data" is the recent posting on SONRIS of the March 2019 production.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on May 30, 2019 at 10:15

Thanks for posting, Rober.  I find that the production volume can use a little more detail so I would include the following as choke setting and pressure are key data along with GOR and produced water.

WELL TESTS

RPT TYP	TEST DATE	RPT DATE	OIL POT	COND	GAS DEL	WATER	BSW%	FLOW PRES	SHUTIN PRES	CHOKE	UPPER PERF	LOWER PERF	BOT HOLE PRES
DM-1R	03/16/2019	05/01/2019	60		69.96	3498	.01	950		24	15048	18745

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MATT on May 31, 2019 at 2:27

Is there more to this issued report 5/1/19?  Not seeing it on Sonris...

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Craft on June 28, 2019 at 2:46

New production posting on McKowen #1

http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellinfo2...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on June 28, 2019 at 5:52

Agree with Jay / looking like they shut the well in all month (only 8 BO produced) and sold 921 BO from the tanks (at least they got $50,000+ in gross proceeds on that).

Permalink Reply by Dion Warr, CPL on June 28, 2019 at 10:19

Also tubing run and isolation packer permit approved 4/8 - likely connected to lack of production for April...

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• Next ›
• Page