Oil & Gas Pro

Haynesville Shale - Well Hall of Fame (5/8/09)

Time for the first annual HS Well HOF based on initial flow rates. I have included wells that had an initial rate above 20 MMcfd.

Go here for the latest update:

http://haynesvilleshale.ning.com/group/drillingriglocations/forum/t...

Views: 344

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


landownerPermalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on May 1, 2009 at 10:25
Good job, Les. GO THORN LAKE----GO SWAN LAKE------Go Grand Cane & Holly

landownerPermalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on May 1, 2009 at 12:41
And I couldn't be more excited about it, KB! Please note how many times you see CHK's name on the list. The well count is:
HK---8
XCO--3
STR--2
EP---1 Total--14
Come on, Chesapeake, show us something!!!!!

landownerPermalink Reply by Wolverine on May 1, 2009 at 15:36
Go Thorn Lake - -- -- -Go Swan Lake-- - -- - -My Brother is in Swan lake area!!! Go Grand Cane & Holly!!! Just goes to show u money goes to money!!!

landownerPermalink Reply by Checkmateking on May 1, 2009 at 12:11
Les, don't forget the KCS well I asked you about.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on May 1, 2009 at 12:25
CMK, I believe it is the following one (KCS = Petrohawk):

#2) 25125 Mcfd - Petrohawk, Roos #H32 Well, Serial #238585, S17-T16N-R11W

landownerPermalink Reply by Checkmateking on May 1, 2009 at 12:46
Gotcha, I forget they are one and the same. I do notice one operator missing from that list.

landownerPermalink Reply by Lee on May 1, 2009 at 13:05
This is an excellent list. From a geography standpoint, these wells extend south/north from townships 13 to 16 and from east/west from ranges 9 to 14. Pretty good spread.
Permalink Reply by Kenya Simonton on May 1, 2009 at 14:31
why is chesapeake seem to be doing so poorly in your opinion????

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on May 1, 2009 at 15:20
Kenya, Chesapeake said in their March Investor Presentation they have tested two wells @ > 22 MMcfd. But I don't think they have identified the specific well names.
Permalink Reply by pal on May 1, 2009 at 15:40
Thanks Les, it makes my land in s35,t16,r11 look good!!!!!!

landownerPermalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on May 1, 2009 at 21:38
I've been told before that the two CHK wells > 20 mil are in Section 2 of 14/12 and Section 2 0f 15/14. We'll see eventually.

landownerPermalink Reply by lanadan Ds3 on May 1, 2009 at 22:11
CHK (Trinadad and Nomac) has at the present time 4 or 5 rigs up and running in T11R15.

CHK is notorious for NOT reporting IP's on a timely basis as we all know.

Production from the 19 units in the above area WILL be eventually forthcoming, however.

For CHK to be THIS interested in this particular area, "sumpins' up !

Stay tuned, the "fat lady" hasn't sung yet!

RSS

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content 

1 Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map

Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2 More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs

More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3 Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5

Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4 Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5 Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push

Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
6 Request For Assistance

Request For Assistance
7 The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

Groups

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service