Driller denies that it contaminated Texas aquifer - EPA Makes Aggressive Move

Posted as an FYI:

Driller denies that it contaminated Texas aquifer


By RAMIT PLUSHNICK-MASTI Associated Press © 2010 The Associated Press

Dec. 7, 2010, 8:44PM

HOUSTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued an emergency order against a Texas gas driller Tuesday, accusing the company of contaminating an aquifer and giving it 48 hours to provide clean drinking water to affected residents and begin taking steps to resolve the problem.
 

The order is unprecedented in Texas, partly because the federal body overstepped the state agency responsible for overseeing gas and oil drilling in the state. The EPA's move could ratchet up a bitter fight between Texas and the EPA that has evolved in the past year from a dispute over environmental issues into a pitched battle over states rights.

 

EPA regional director Al Armendariz said he issued the order against Range Resources of Fort Worth, Texas, because he felt the Texas Railroad Commission was not responding quickly enough to contamination found in two water wells belonging to Parker County residents in North Texas.

The EPA began inspecting the wells in August after receiving complaints from residents who said the Texas commission and Range Resources had not responded to problems they were having with their drinking water. The EPA inspected the wells with the commission, Armendariz said, and found high levels of explosive methane, as well as other contaminants, including cancer-causing benzene.

"We thought what we found in the homes was alarming," Armendariz told The Associated Press.

Range Resources on Tuesday denied being the source of the contamination.

 

"We've been working with the Railroad Commission as well as the landowners over the last several months," spokesman Matt Pitzarella said. "We believe that the methane in the water has absolutely no connection to our operations in the area. We provided that information to the Railroad Commission, the landowners and to the EPA." The Railroad Commission issued a statement saying members of its staff also have not reached conclusions about the source of the contamination. It said Range Resources is cooperating with the commission's investigation and already had agreed last week to conduct more tests, as well as to perform soil gas surveys, monitor gas concentrations, and offer a water supply to affected residents.

 

"If the data indicates oil field activities are responsible for the gas found in the water well, the (commission) will require assessment, cleanup, and evaluate what fines or penalties may be
assessed as necessary," the statement said. But John Blevins, the director of the EPA's compliance assurance and enforcement division, wrote in a letter Tuesday to Range Resources that the contamination findings present "a potential imminent endangerment to the health of persons using those private drinking water wells."

 

The EPA gave Range Resources 24 hours to inform the agency in writing that it will comply with the federal order. It then had 48 hours to provide impacted families with clean drinking water and install
monitors in the homes to ensure methane gas levels don't rise to explosive levels. The company was given five days to begin a thorough survey of the aquifer to determine if other wells and families also could be impacted by contamination.

 

Range Resources has been using new technologies that make it possible to extract once out-of-reach natural gas reserves. Horizontal drilling, along with the hydraulic fracturing, make it possible for drillers to permeate once impenetrable geologic formations called shale. The companies pump high volumes of water and chemicals at great pressure into the well bore to permeate the rock, and
there have been complaints in some places — especially in Pennsylvania — that underground aquifers have been contaminated in the process.

 

This is the first such suspicion in Texas, Armendariz said. The families in Parker County have not been identified, but Armendariz said they had been using the wells for years and never had issues until Range began drilling nearby in April 2009. One of the greatest fears is of explosion, he said.

The EPA issued the emergency order under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Texas Railroad commissioner Michael L. Williams called it "Washington politics of the worst kind."

 

"The EPA's act is nothing more than grandstanding in an effort to interject the federal government into Texas business," he said.

___

Associated Press writer Terry Wallace in Dallas contributed to this report.



Tags: contamination, drilling, epa, texas

Views: 850

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The EPA made the right decision is this case. The state commissioners and the Texas Railroad commission have to long stood by and allowed oil and gas to operate in a manner that does not always look out for the rights of theTexas Landowner. We need to re-address the Eminent Domain law in this state and re-define when and if it is needed and what truly qualifies,before condemnation can take place. The land owner's rights need to be considered in order to allow them to have imput into the valve of their land and not allow companies to dictate the price. If companies are allowed to set the price,then they can threaten Eminent domain or carry it out.
if you read the rrc statement, one of the two Range wells tested had some preesure in the bradenhead. this suggests a casing leak. note that the complaint is reportedly of recent origin, with additional testing right around thanksgiving. EPA canceleda meeting with little notice earlier this month. Based on what I've seen, it is Rangess fault,and not related directly to fracing. I wish EPA would have let this work itself out before issuig public staements that are inflammatory

. all spelling errors do to my thumbs on my smart phone.
stay tuned, jackson has more up her sleeve over at the epa
I don't think many of the NG companies really understand the public fear of NG right now. Gasland, helped by the deadly SF explosion, has scared people and legislators.

Even if Obama and all the Democrats go away in 2012 this issue will still be in our face. Right now NG scares people who do not live with it everyday. The voting public (of all persuasions) around the US does not want the gov't less involved in regulating O&G - they want NG regulated more.

IMHO, The NG indusrtry needs to convince the public of 4 things:

1) that recent NG has not caused the infamous flaming water faucets

2) that fracing is safe or at least can be made safe with new developments

3) get the message out that this fuel can change our economic and political future

4) reconnect NG with clean energy and also with independence for 3rd world nations who have shale. Imagine a world no longer at the mercy of a handful of OPEC states.

Howling .....
A local issue? That is a good idea. Right now both NY and Penn seem to be rejecting shale NG. I am not familiar enough with the local ecology or geology.

However, they will still need to buy juice from somewhere. That's why I can see the LA and TX building a number of shale NG electrical plants and selling the electricity to all points North, East and West.

Thanks for your compliments, GD, but I am one of the rankest rookies on GHS. I do live about 2,000 miles from my minerals in LA, and maybe that gives me a view others down in LA don't have.

The PR against NG and shale is so strong on the West Coast that I don't even mention my connection to NG even among the most conservative, pro-business people. Last night my stepson got an award for being one of the young movers and shakers of our community. He is an accountant and his staff knows about my O&G interests because they do my taxes. One of them asked me "what's that like?" He did not mean how much did I make, he asked it as if I owned shares in a prison complex. He had a look on his face like I should own porn or something. He is far from the only one I have encountered this from. It's nice to be on a blog like GHS to be around regular people from LA!

Believe me, people outside the South who are not familiar with NG are spooked of it right now. My stepson says that every time some accident happens the accountants in his office ask him about it. (however, don't ask me how I managed to raise an award winning accountant. I swear he does not take after me :)
Logger,

When they ask "what's that like" tell them it's a warm feeling. Then tell them to pass this winter with their gas furnace in the OFF position. Come spring they may have a different opinion. Envirowackos make my blood boil. JMO
Ronny, it's wasn't an environmentalist who asked me this - it was an accountant who specializes in natural resources, mostly logging. He's probably one of the more older, conservative partners in my stepson's firm.

That's what really worried me, this is not coming from environmentalists at all. It much more widespread around the US .

It means that LA & TX might get paid a little more for our NG. Maybe it will boost the price if the supply is restricted.

I'm really interested in the smaller, poor nations around the globe. The world has a LOT of shale gas and if it could be developed (outside the US, it could cripple OPEC in a few years. I would love to see that.

I've been to many county and state court oil and gas meetings/ hearings:  I've heard from oil and gas representatives at the county meeetings that oil and gas is under state jurisdiction and I've heard from O and G representatives at the state meetings/ hearings - this is under federal jurisdiction.  Now that the FDA steps in, it now becomes a local jurisdiction. 

 

Then we see natural gas and heating oil companies ask the state oil and gas commissions that their prices be raised higher.  Do royalty holders have a right to ask that their interest, that are lower than the normal interest rates, to be raised?  Fairness Doctrine?  There are many instances when the Federal Government needs to step in.  Pollution, unfair corporate practices, abuses of power, and regulation.   Alot of this shale gas is sold and going over seas.  If there was a need for just energy, the United States would of broaden nuclear energy and also would of went Geothermal when the technology became available.  Oil and Gas is a revenue resource for the government and the O and G investor and the O and G Corporation.  It wouldn't be so bad if fairness was across the board, and the O and G corporations were honest to the land owners and cleaned up their messes without land owners needing to resort to a lawsuit.  But it's sad band true - money is the only looked at outcome of the O and G by all those involved...  

Just can't help myself from posting on this one...since most of the talk is about "things" that had happened in the Marcellus and Barnett

I can't help but wonder what some of ya'll would think if it was you that was having to deal with not being able to use your faucet or lord knows your toilet and the PIA that would entail. Imagine all the water that you use for just one day...all those flushes, showers, dishwashers, washing clothes...you can get around brushing your teeth tho. I would like to know where your compassion is for another human being that is having to deal with the mess that they didn't ask for.....like a car wreck. Everyone and I mean Everyone definitely including me makes mistakes...ya'll don't want my laundry list of mistakes.....but this includes all in the o&g industry. I know this industry and how many mistakes are made especially in the hurry up you're costing me a dollar program....The problem is that o&g doesn't really "know" how far they frac job is going North, South, East & West...they have an educated guess......but it is still a guess. Throw in a couple of faults for traveling and man you could have a big ole mess. I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall when a company that was bought out for their expertise in the shale was dealing with fracing into their "other" well that was 660 feet from each other. Wasn't expected, wasn't planned, wasn't gonna happen, wasn't a good guess.......This messed them up that they had to plug back and drill "Another" lateral and guess what that didn't work....pipe is stuck in the hole and they are only producing from a small section of the 2nd lateral...So this well has 2 laterals (know where ya can get some free drill collars) and not even producing 1 mcf...Talk about some money that was spent on that well....And yet they are @ it again in the same section drilling into another one as I type and yet I am so thankful that they are drilling away from me and my water well. This is one of the main protection that I got in my lease...yadda ya bring me potable water no matter what....but I know that in the event that happens...I will be in the courthouse fighting the monster, cuz everybody is going to be pointing fingers and not giving a damn if I can flush my toilet. I know that the stall tactic that big o&g uses and it will be a long time b4 I even would see a courtroom and boy don't you know I will be reeking by then.......
If you think the DNR is going to come to the rescue, you have a better chance of winning the lottery. So I for one is happy that someone has stepped in to help these people......
Earlene who lives on a water well
Here's a pic of the scout report on the frac job:

I don't, at present, live on well water but some of my near neighbors do so I understand how important it is to have water protection clauses in your lease. It is just my opinion that the industry needs to step up and take a much more proactive stance about accepting responsibility for ruined water wells and taking ANY and ALL steps available to remedy the problems, when found. Their old game of eternal foot dragging and legal wrangling until the opponent goes broke or dies of old age has made them the bad guy and they won't lose that image until their attitudes change.
When it comes to protecting water, it is not an US vs. THEM situation where someone wins and the other side loses. It is a clear matter of stepping up and doing what is RIGHT for the environment and the people who are impacted by drilling operations.
Absolutely jffree1....Absolutely
Earlene

Earlene,

It's great to see you back.  This site just got more interesting....  Please don't stay away so long again.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service