Replies to This Discussion

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 9, 2010 at 5:39

Thanks for the heads up, Les. This has remained the unknown and neglected corner of the Play for some time. And I am sure a lot of members will be gratified to know it is about to get some attention.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Highwayman on February 9, 2010 at 8:18

It's not permitted yet, but there is a well site under construction in S5-T12N-R8W just off the Brushy Creek Rd.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 9, 2010 at 8:34

Highwayman, thanks for the heads up. I will be on the lookout for a well permit in the future.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on March 5, 2010 at 17:29

Highwayman, Encana received the well permit today:

EnCana, Anita Robinson 5 #H1 Well, Serial #240963, S5-T12N-R8W

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Highwayman on March 6, 2010 at 13:03

Thanks Les. A pretty good chunk of Section 5 is mine, so this is very good.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on February 9, 2010 at 10:59

Much further South, but not as far east. Encana's Adcock 17-H in 13/8 may actually be the farthest easterly well to date.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Mike Tomlin on February 9, 2010 at 11:36

Will we ever have info on the results from the adcock well......

Mike, impatiently awaiting good news. lol

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by jr on February 9, 2010 at 13:07

whats up with the messenger well it is listed as a cotton valley on sonris and is not showing much production. is that area still in the play? any info would be helpful!

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 9, 2010 at 13:27

From the Messenger SONRIS Scout Report:

COMPLETED 9-8-08; GAS; CV RA; 5727 MCFD; 12/64 CHOKE; 8376 FP; CP ON PRK; PERFS 13,346-13,817'

The "PERFS" are at Haynesville depths regardless of what the producing formation is called.

http://www.gohaynesvilleshale.com/profiles/blogs/cotton-valley-and-...

And production from a "vertical" shale well always exhibits rapid decline as the portion of the formation that is fraced is small.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on February 9, 2010 at 13:44

Messinger well production:

7201 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
10/01/2009 615772 1 0 0 5914 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
09/01/2009 615772 1 0 0 7810 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
08/01/2009 615772 1 0 0 9793 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
07/01/2009 615772 1 0 0 10949 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
06/01/2009 615772 1 0 0 11794 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
05/01/2009 615772 1 0 0 13833 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
01/01/2009 608551 1 0 0 17341 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
12/01/2008 608551 1 0 0 25368 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
11/01/2008 608551 1 0 0 41313 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
10/01/2008 608551 1 0 0 69796 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
09/01/2008 608551 1 0 0 96196 0 0 NATCHITOCHES
08/01/2008 608551 0 0 0 17426

Find another vertical well that has this kind of production.
This has to mean something for the area this well is in.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 9, 2010 at 13:51

BD. You are correct. It's one heck of a vertical HA well. However, it leaves me, and you, wondering what it would be producing with a 4620' lateral and 12 to 15 frac stages. I suspect it would be impressive. The lag time between completion of the Messenger (the first HA well I ever scouted) and now has concerned a lot of mineral owners. Maybe the wait will be over soon. Certainly this year.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on February 9, 2010 at 13:56

Skip,
Exactly, I think the Companies are laying low on this area. Why is there no activity in the area of the most productive vertical well in the play? CV or HA who cares?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page