Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "GD, vast majority of LNG is sold under long term contracts with pricing tied to crud…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 1, 2009 to Gas Glut?	34	Feb 3, 2009 Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher)
landowner "Getoverit, there have not yet been any HS wells shown as permitted in SONRIS for T12…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 1, 2009 to More DeSoto Parish Units Being Formed	51	Apr 21, 2009 Reply by The_Baron
"Wanda, it may mean drilling would occur soon but not necessarily. Probably dependent…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 30, 2009 to PUBLIC HEARING TO POOL SEC-20-T-11 R-15	6	Jan 30, 2009 Reply by Wanda
landowner "Fngrs, this well was permitted as a Haynesville test (permit does not say sand or sh…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 29, 2009 to Serial # 238990	3	Jan 29, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "Dion, I have had experience in the past with transferring wellbores between units fo…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 28, 2009 to KCS & WSF New Permits	33	Apr 18, 2009 Reply by Brandy LaField
Oil & Gas Pro "Sesport, that's just my guess as I assume the O&G company needs to confirm the p…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 28, 2009 to KCS & WSF New Permits	33	Apr 18, 2009 Reply by Brandy LaField
Oil & Gas Pro "KB, if ownership (both working interest and royalty interest) is the same in both fo…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 28, 2009 to KCS & WSF New Permits	33	Apr 18, 2009 Reply by Brandy LaField
Oil & Gas Pro "Sesport, I believe Dion's comments are most relevant to areas without any current sh…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 28, 2009 to KCS & WSF New Permits	33	Apr 18, 2009 Reply by Brandy LaField
Oil & Gas Pro "Graysands, they may want to have some permitted CV wells ready just in case they are…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to KCS & WSF New Permits	33	Apr 18, 2009 Reply by Brandy LaField
landowner "Graysands, several new LNG supply projects in Qatar, Russia, Indonesia, Australia &a…" Les Bamburg replied Jan 27, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg

‹ Previous
1
…
317
318
319
320
321
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.