Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "The following is a link to the news release on the Chesapeake website which includes…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 1, 2008 to The Word is OUT!!! Chesapeake tells ALL!!!	37	Nov 7, 2008 Reply by Kat Bloomfield
"John B, my "back of the envelope" estimate of the areal extent of the HS in Louisian…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 30, 2008 to Total Acreage in Haynesville Shale	2	Jul 1, 2008 Reply by Chris D. Day
landowner "Congrats Northwest Louisiana!!!!" Les Bamburg replied Jun 30, 2008 to Petrohawk's Monster Well in Bossier Parish (Elm Grove)	37	Jul 22, 2008 Reply by RAY
landowner "Joel, once companies move into the development mode note the lateral length and dist…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 29, 2008 to Wells per Section	15	Oct 21, 2009 Reply by Shaleeee
"Gatorguy, for this example I will assume the section (640 acres) is fully developed…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 28, 2008 to North American Shale Gas Players Energy Spotlight PODCAST	16	Jun 29, 2008 Reply by Gatorguy
"Insomniacnla, a real simple example is as follows. A section or 640 acres may hold ~…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 28, 2008 to North American Shale Gas Players Energy Spotlight PODCAST	16	Jun 29, 2008 Reply by Gatorguy
"DWS, just realize the 1 Tcf was an error by the commentor. I assume he meant to say…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 28, 2008 to North American Shale Gas Players Energy Spotlight PODCAST	16	Jun 29, 2008 Reply by Gatorguy
landowner "Check the discussions at "Well above Messenger in Red River Parish" Forum since it c…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 25, 2008 to North Natchitoches parish	39	Oct 15, 2008 Reply by Margaret Wren
landowner "Bukstar, you may want to provide Township-Range-Section if known." Les Bamburg replied Jun 25, 2008 to North Natchitoches parish	39	Oct 15, 2008 Reply by Margaret Wren
"DWS, I am not sure you read my previous posting. The "non-consent" penalty does not…" Les Bamburg replied Jun 23, 2008 to Legislature Passes New Penalties - But They Are Not Applicable to Owners Who Don't Lease At All	16	Jul 4, 2008 Reply by Snake Stewart

‹ Previous
1
…
367
368
369
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.