Henry's Discussions (1,535)

View

Discussions Replied To (1130)	Replies	Latest Activity
Oil & Gas Pro "Les, Do you have any thoughts on the wells on Secs 27 and 34? Chesapeake completed t…" Henry replied Jun 30, 2010 to T10N-R12W: The Ninth Township-Range to Reach 36 Haynesville Units (4/8/10)	11	Jul 14, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Great! We would all like to follow your progress." Henry replied Jun 29, 2010 to Now what? Where's My Royalties - It's been 10 Months!	109	Jul 10, 2010 Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner
Oil & Gas Pro "EFree, Thanks. Can you tell us the $3.58 --- for what month was that?" Henry replied Jun 29, 2010 to OIL AND GAS NEWS - JUNE 27, 2010 shreveporttimes.com	28	Jun 30, 2010 Reply by Charles Free
Oil & Gas Pro "EFree, Congrats on having such a good well. You are a lucky person. This is a reall…" Henry replied Jun 28, 2010 to OIL AND GAS NEWS - JUNE 27, 2010 shreveporttimes.com	28	Jun 30, 2010 Reply by Charles Free
landowner "flatlander, Since you seem to be having some luck with your operator regarding being…" Henry replied Jun 27, 2010 to Now what? Where's My Royalties - It's been 10 Months!	109	Jul 10, 2010 Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner
landowner "Skip, Here's where we agree... "It will be a process that will take some years." I…" Henry replied Jun 27, 2010 to Watershed Moment in the Haynesville's Development? Ruling In the Questar Case (see attached)	55	Jun 29, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "Skip, I'm going to beg to differ with your logic. RS 31:122 requires the lessee to d…" Henry replied Jun 27, 2010 to Watershed Moment in the Haynesville's Development? Ruling In the Questar Case (see attached)	55	Jun 29, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "Harvey, Read this. It should explain a lot to you." Henry replied Jun 27, 2010 to Now what? Where's My Royalties - It's been 10 Months!	109	Jul 10, 2010 Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner
landowner "If I take this literally, and read that the lessee has an obligation "to FULLY devel…" Henry replied Jun 26, 2010 to Watershed Moment in the Haynesville's Development? Ruling In the Questar Case (see attached)	55	Jun 29, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner ""...the legal obligation to fully develop a lease applied to the Haynesville Shale."…" Henry replied Jun 25, 2010 to Watershed Moment in the Haynesville's Development? Ruling In the Questar Case (see attached)	55	Jun 29, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant

‹ Previous
1
…
84
85
86
87
88
…
113
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.