Search Results (3,752)

Discussions	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "ENCANA is in the preliminary phase of placing a 50' wide pipeline r-o-w that runs in…" RBT replied Jan 9, 2010 to Application Notice (Ten units)- Sabine Parish, T8N-R10W	21	Feb 3, 2010 Reply by sesport
landowner "Gayle. No operator wishes to run a pipeline across miles of land to serve a single w…" Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant replied Feb 3, 2010 to Excel Spreadsheet to Calculate Well Payouts	59	Feb 3, 2010 Reply by FXEF
"Jack Blake-- does it make any sense to Liquify NG to transport it on land and then h…" adubu replied Sep 1, 2010 to Up to 475 CNG-powered buses headed to New York City	9	Sep 2, 2010 Reply by Sarah
landowner "AL, Bishop and Drake in San Augustine and Boone in Shelby have rigs on them now. Hin…" jffree1 replied Oct 10, 2010 to SM Energy Question??????	5	Oct 11, 2010 Reply by jffree1
landowner "I find the fact that the pipelines can be deep with this technology. You don't neces…" Mac Davis replied Oct 11, 2010 to HDD Used to Install Pipeline	12	Oct 13, 2010 Reply by sesport
Oil & Gas Pro "Section 21 (16.5 MMcfd) and 23 (17.098 MMcfd) are adjacent sections with better than…" Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant replied May 15, 2011 to OIL & GAS NEWS (LOCATIONS AND COMPLETIONS) - MAY 15 -theshreveporttimes.com	3	May 15, 2011 Reply by dbob
landowner "Wondering whether pipeline company's request for addendum to original ROW agreement…" Clay G. R. replied Jan 26, 2012 to ROW for Pipeline	10	Feb 8, 2012 Reply by Texas Gal
landowner "Party Chairman O'Bummer backed this groups "Flow" play on our having LPG facilities…" Bill R replied Jun 11, 2012 to Nat Gas Trends and future price predications	42	Jun 13, 2012 Reply by adubu
"TMS greed is okay, blackjack. Go right ahead. LOL! I think the Keystone XL has va…" Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant replied Oct 23, 2012 to Texas landowners take a rare stand against Big Oil	17	Oct 24, 2012 Reply by Todd Hackney
landowner "As with any pipeline right of way I have handled, the rate being paid is different f…" Jim McGowen replied Apr 26, 2013 to Pipeline ROW prices	7	Apr 30, 2013 Reply by Larry G Smith P.E.

‹ Previous
1
…
106
107
108
109
110
…
376
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	what does this mean
5	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
6	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
7	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

RSS
View All

Groups

Unleased Mineral Owners

287 members
Red River Parish

307 members

Natchitoches Parish

409 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.