Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on December 20, 2009 at 7:02

Joanne, thanks for explaining all the dots, LOL. Do you have a copy of the agreement that you can post to the site so we can read it? Or a well name or number that we can research?
Burk had agreements with Chesapeake on a couple of different areas... one which they honored and one which Burk had sued them over because they reneged on the deal. This all happened early in the year so, from the date you posted, this is either a new developement or the culmination of the earlier deal.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lorissa Gail on December 20, 2009 at 7:20

The.Memorandum.of.farmout.was.in.the.shelby.co.records.under.Burk.Royalty.Co./filed.on.September.23.2009.....(cc.co.shelby.tx.us/)..The.Bush.well.and.the.Pearson.well.are.waiting.for.pipeline.as.well.as.one.other.In.that.area(I.don't.remember.the.name.of.this.well.but.was.completed.in.around.feb.of.this.year.I.think)......I.was.doing.a.little.research.at.random.and.came.across.this.info....I.had.not.known.who.was.included.in.the.Burk/Chesapeke.settlement-or.agreement..

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on December 20, 2009 at 14:18

The Bush #1, API 419-31496, and the Pearson #1, API 419-31487, were both permitted by Burk in July. There is nothing else posted for either well except for a change from vertical to directional on the Pearson well. No completion data and no change of operator or ownership posted (but that doesn't mean a lot because the RRC is so notoriously slow about posting completion data). Right now, today, they are still Burk wells on the RRC website.

• ▶ Reply