I have another question about proper witnesses - when the land is situated in Louisiana. On several occasions I've had husbands witness their wife's signature when the wife was dealing with her separate property (and the husband wasn't a party, just a witness to his wife's signature). I've also had the reverse of this where the wife witnesses the husband's signature when its the husband's separate property (and the wife is not a party, just a witness). Seems like this is a fairly common practice with landmen.
My question, is this pracice in these circumstances (separate property) perfectly OK or would it be better to have someone other than the spouse witness the signing party's signature??? Any comments would be appreciated. Thank you.
There is nothing that I am aware of that would cause the husband's appearance as a witness to cause the wife's signature for a lease on her separate property to not be self-proving if the other conditions are met, i. e. another witness and a Notary's acknowledgement.
KB, There is confusion about what two witnesses and a Notary seal gets you. When those criteria are met you have is a self proving signature. The absence of either does not invalidate the instrument.
In 30 years I have not had any problems with this husband/wife separate property scenario. I'll ask around and see if there are other opinions among my peers.
I was doing curative many years ago and the examining attorney asked for me to "make sure" a particular mineral owner was dead. i said "good as done". I found out later that all he wanted was a Death Certificate.