Environmental Defense Fund admits propaganda effort against natural gas exploration is bunk

Full article is here.

 

"In January, the documentary Gasland won a special jury prize at the Sundance Film Festival. The documentary attacked the process of “fracking,” which involves pumping a solution that is 99 percent sand and water, plus a few trace chemicals, underground at high pressure. This creates fractures in the rock formations that allow oil and gas to flow to collection points. The film claimed that the process pollutes groundwater with devastating consequences. (For more on Gasland and fracking, see this article from the Examiner’s “Big Green” ser...)

Multiple EPA studies have shown fracking is safe and effective, but the propaganda effort got the attention of congress. In March, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., held hearings on whether the practice should be federally regulated rather than regulated at the state level. After issuing subpoenas to eight energy companies, Waxman dropped the probe.

Now fracking is being defended by a very unlikely source — the Environmental Defense Fund, one of the biggest and most active environmental non-profits in the country.

Appearing on the Energy and Environment program “On Point” EDF Senior Policy Advisor was utterly dismissive of the concerns about fracking:

E&E TV: “Do you believe that [hydraulic fracturing] can be used safely?” (5:23)

EDF’s Scott Anderson: “Yes I do. I think in the vast majority of cases, if wells are constructed right and operated right, that hydraulic fracturing will not cause a problem.” (5:19)

<snip>

"It’s not every day you get a big environmentalist organization exposing a big environmental cause du jour as being totally without merit."
---------------------------
BTW, you can comment on the article.

Tags: fracking, gasland

Views: 29

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Your title is a bit misleading, that's not quite what their position is, which from what I can gather is essentially neutral on an organizational level.  This article appears on their front page currently, right next to the polar bear picture.  http://solutions.edf.org/2010/12/07/can-we-tap-shale-gas-safely/

 

Despite starting with what sounds like a completely reasonable statement about not being able to do away with fossil fuels any time soon, the overall ambivalent stance and pro-regulatory rhetoric is in all likelihood part of a hedge to assuage angry members/donors, some responses from which can be found at the bottom of the article.  They're still mad about what Mr Anderson said, one even brought up this very interview.  Turns out Mr. Anderson is also an ex oil and gas attorney?  Small world, I suppose.  I bet the blowback for the EDA has been fairly robust.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service