Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 17, 2011 at 2:11

I'll be happy to look into them and post the results if you can get the S/N's.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JHH on March 17, 2011 at 2:16

Yes, i heard that too but don't have any details.  Something is going on and hardly anyone is talking about it.  thanks for the reply.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 17, 2011 at 2:20

Oh there are plenty of folks "talking" about it.  Just none of them have any details that are helpful in determining the truth of the rumors.  If anyone has particulars like the Anadarko wells mentioned by kcm, I'll check them out and let you know what I find.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on March 17, 2011 at 3:05

JHH, I believe you are refering to the Nancy Brewster GU #8 Well (API #42-203-35021) located about 2 miles south of I-20 in Harrison County.  The well was targeting a potential oil formation located about 2600 ft below the Haynesville Shale.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on March 17, 2011 at 3:23

That is the one but I've also heard the Anadarko version that has Valance in Harrison at the Panola line and Anadarko in Panola in the same vicinity.  I haven't had time to sift through permits to try to pin down a specific location where that might be true.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 17, 2011 at 3:28

LOL!  Yes, that's one.  The rumors also include BP.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by P.G. on March 17, 2011 at 4:10

At least it would be easier to control a leak on land than under the ocean wouldn't it?

Oil leak that is....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JHH on March 17, 2011 at 5:22

and i also heard Anadarko has a good oil well nearby.  i think Panola County.

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JHH on March 17, 2011 at 5:20

Yes sir, that's it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on March 17, 2011 at 17:38

JHH, the Nancy Brewster well finished drilling before the end of December.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David Bass on March 30, 2011 at 13:11

DeSoto Parish: CGG Veritas has offered landowners total of $25/acre to do 3D seismic activity. ($15/acre for permit + $10/acre for timber damages)   Our lawyer said that they will not give anymore than that and "they'll just  go around you, so you might as well do it."   Does anyone know if this is a fair "market value" price for seismic operations?  Does anyone have a copy of a   seismic operations "permit" that is landowner friendly.  All I have is proposed permit from CGG Veritas and it doesn't have any time limit, depth limit, etc in the body of the permit.  Thank you!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by olddog573 on March 30, 2011 at 14:03

it's fair.  that's all you will get.  they do very little damage.  no issues.  they have done my property twice.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page