Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by FXEF on April 12, 2011 at 14:45

Here is what SONRIS reports for Bentley Lumber #242407.

 

Attachments:

• formations_.jpg, 74 KB

Permalink Reply by Joe Aldridge on April 13, 2011 at 1:25

TD,

It looks like you are correct. They are calling it the Edwards. That's not on my stratigraphic list. So here I go assuming again. It must be what we call the TMS. It looks like they perforated two areas of 20 Ft. or so and fraced each in a vertical hole. Am I correct on that? 

Permalink Reply by Joe Aldridge on April 11, 2011 at 17:38

Linda, I'm in East Baton Rouge Parish. I just went to a pre-app. conference for a Tuscaloosa unit that showed the faulting thru Tusc. If the Tusc. is as faulted as they say then the Chalk should be very fractured. I would agree with their faulting I just don't agree that the Tusc. will be productive where they are drilling. Don't understand them spending that kind of money on a small bright spot on 3-D seismic.

Permalink Reply by David Crockett on April 12, 2011 at 11:03

Thanks to everyone for all of the information.  I didn't realize that they were leasing on hwy. 28 west.  My land is southeast of there.  I actually don't have a clue as to whether that well is in the Austin Chalk or like two dogs said in the tuscaloosa marine shale or eagleford.  I basically have no knowledge or information to share, I am just enjoying everybody else's knowledge. 

Joe, I grew up in east baton rouge parish, in baker.  that was a long, long time ago. 

Permalink Reply by Joe Aldridge on April 12, 2011 at 11:19

I'm between Baker and Port Hudson. So at one time we were almost neighbors.

Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on April 12, 2011 at 13:48

Hey, Linda we will figure it all out at some point in time.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on April 12, 2011 at 11:05

Joe, Two Dogs, besides being a Pirate, is one of the most experienced and reliable industry members on GHS.  He often knows much more than he can say here. 

A word to the wise is sufficient.

Permalink Reply by Joe Aldridge on April 12, 2011 at 11:54

Skip, I'm just trying to sort things out without any logs. I'm not being critical of what TD is saying - I just don't think Indigo drilled  deep enough for TMS or Eagleford. The Total Depth of the Bentley well is over 1000 ft. above what appears to be the vertical depth that the Chalk shows in the Anadarko GASRS wells. And TMS and Eagleford are below the Chalk. I don't have any logs from that area. 

And yes, I know TD is very knowledgeable. I have emailed with him a couple of times outside of the treads and he has been very open and informative about what he does and where he's working. I was trying to keep this in the tread so others would contribute to my guessing.

It will be interesting to see what Indigo declares when they decide to release the information on the well. Obviously, they are holding the info tight for a reason. Maybe leases or unitization or no pipeline or whatever. Again I'm guessing.

Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on April 13, 2011 at 4:46

Joe here is the study I was reading.

Attachments:

• TuscaloosaMarineShale.pdf, 7.3 MB

Permalink Reply by Joe Aldridge on April 13, 2011 at 5:58

Thanks TD.

Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on April 13, 2011 at 16:27

Shiver me timbers matiee, I bees one with me coloures and the salt spray in me face, Yo Ho, Yo Ho, Yo Ho, Skipper me mate come join in me cruise down the bayous of Vernon, Rapides, Avoyelles, Evangeline, St Landry, Pt Coupee and parts of Allen and Beauregard, in the quest, for the Black Gold. ARRRRGGGHHH to the naysayers, the bounty lies where this privateer may go. Thanks Skip.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on April 13, 2011 at 16:31

I like bayou tours.  Particularly when Black Gold is involved.  Just save me some of that grog ya ole pirate.  LOL!

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page