landowner

Well Permit Pulled due to Walmart Objections

I do not know if this true, but I have heard that the A.T. Martinez well permit (Shuteye Rd in Many, LA) was pulled due to objections from Wal-Mart - and there will be a hearing - if this is true what are other situations that could stop a well from being drilled?

Views: 55

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


landownerPermalink Reply by j garrett on February 2, 2010 at 15:21
I think a Wal-Mart in Many might be a bigger story.....

landownerPermalink Reply by Shaleeee on February 2, 2010 at 15:33
Maybe to you - but then some people feel the need to just have a say on a topic without contributing a anything of value.

landownerPermalink Reply by RBT on February 3, 2010 at 3:30
Only speculating here, Shaleeee, but since Wal-Mart has become the new owner of record just recently, they may not have been initially served with a pre-app. notice.

Hopefully this is the case, and after having their say at a hearing, Wal-Mart maybe would not have any objections.
Permalink Reply by William E Lafitte III on February 3, 2010 at 3:33
I own forty acres in this unit and have not received notification of a new hearing(should I?).

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 15, 2010 at 18:13
William,

Lafitte Farms?
Permalink Reply by William E Lafitte III on February 16, 2010 at 2:20
yes

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 16, 2010 at 3:49
William, I believe you should be notified once a new unit application is made for your section but you may want to check the hearing schedule on Sonris for anything related to the Pendleton-Many Field.

landownerPermalink Reply by FXEF on February 14, 2010 at 16:28
They don't have hearings for well permits, only have hearings for unit order applications. Has a well permit been posted on SONRIS?

landownerPermalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on February 14, 2010 at 17:27
With a section, towmship and range it is pretty easy to check out!

landownerPermalink Reply by Shaleeee on February 15, 2010 at 4:14
I have attempted to find the original thread on this subject to no avail but I think it is S20 - T7 R11W
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 15, 2010 at 4:56
Ask Les B, Shaleee. He posted the thread and the last comment was that he thought he should pull it because the application was withdrawn. The section may have been 22.

landownerPermalink Reply by Shaleeee on February 15, 2010 at 15:23
Thanks jffree1 - I am going to let this drop - I should not have started the topic without fully understanding the situation - as I said it was only hearsay - what I really was interested in was what situations could cause an (application) to be withdrawn and can there be objections from interested parties that could put a halt on a well being drilled?

RSS

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content 

1 Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map

Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2 More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs

More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3 Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5

Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4 Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5 Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push

Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
6 Request For Assistance

Request For Assistance
7 The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

Groups

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service