“The economics just compel you to look for oil rather than natural gas right now,” chairman and chief executive officer Aubrey McClendon told attendees at Hart Energy’s annual Developing Unconventional Gas conference in Fort Worth last week.

McClendon admitted on the company’s February earnings call that $5.00 per million BTU pricing on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) equates to $3.50 gas at the wellhead, once differentials like gathering and compression costs are included in the cost calculus. “Even $3.50 gas at the wellhead does not create enough cash flow in the industry to maintain today’s drilling price — even for the best-managed shale plays,” he said.

Excluding takeaway-pipeline expenses (like gathering and compression costs), Chesapeake posted, on average, production and development costs of $3.47 per Mcfe, according to the company’s 2010 annual earnings report.

To mangement’s credit, they have mitigated the risk of a prolonged slump in natural gas prices and have provided more predictable future cash flow stream from operations through a hedging program for 2010. As of February 17, 2010, the company had hedged through swaps and collars approximately 60 percent of its expected natural gas and oil production in 2010 at average prices of $8.16 per thousand cubic feet equivalent (Mcfe).

The price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil generally is denominated in terms of barrels, where one barrel has an energy content of approximately 5.8 million Btu. With the price of natural gas (at the Henry Hub), in contrast, denominated in million Btu, assuming ceteris paribus, on the basis of their energy contents, the ratio of the crude oil price to the natural gas price would be approximately 6.0 times. From 1990 through 2007, the average price ratio was about 8.6 times, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (Factors Affecting Natural Gas Prices, as detailed in a recent EIA report.)

Why is a U.S natural gas producer such as Chesapeake suddenly priming the drill-bit for oil? In futures trading Monday on the NYMEX, oil for May delivery settled at $86.62 a barrel — twenty times the May delivery closing price of natural gas (of $4.27 per Mcfe).

In keeping with its $4.1 billion (+) capex budget for 2010, the company is initially looking to shift 18 to 20 idled gas-focused rigs (from sub $5.00 gas wells) to the finding and exploration of oil and natural gas liquids in new unconventional plays, such as leases in Granite Wash in the Texas Panhandle and western Oklahoma and Eagle Ford in south Texas.

Chairman McClendon, whose actions often leave the observer thinking hubris is his moral imperative, crowed on recent conference calls that the company is likely already sitting on more than one billion of “liquid rich reserves.” Extracting these reserves, however, could prove more problematic — but more on that in my next Chesapeake post!

 

Buck

Views: 8

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Just because you make money off of dealing with someone and are happy about the deal doesn't mean you have to like them.
Others will have to make decisions if prices decline more. All ways the stock holders looking over your shoulder.
Buck - You know what I'm "strucken" by, the crawfishin' in JR's post. 80)

IMO, the operators may leave to go develop more lucrative resources for now, may sell some acreage to raise capital, but ... but ... BUT, our resource remains in the ground, and thus remains ours, until such time as it's needed & in demand again. Tthat time will come. And we'll be here still, better educated & even more savvy.

80)
Gas $4 mcf....and falling...no real export market...

Oil $85.00/bbl and rising...Global demand up......USA is dependent on large amounts of foreign oil from people who want to kill us....

......hmmmm, let me see which one has a brighter future.

Try googleing the Bakken Shale. A couple more fields like this and we can tell the Arabs to **** off.
JR - There ya' go "struken" me with some of that "crawfishin' " again. lol

See, the thing is, we're not talking "dog food" here, we're talkin' an energy resource. It's been in use for a looonnnng time in the US, going to become even more in demand, IMO, as those coal-fired electric plants are retired, as the demand for electricity continues to climb (ever count how many "gadgets" you're plugging in at home, ever think of the spike in electrical demand that will accompany any introduction of electric plug-in vehicles?), as new industries are created for new technologies.

MIGHT be waiting a long time, then again MIGHT not.

fun watchin ya' crawfish, though - 90)
Buck.

yes.

Ask all the guys working the rigs and service companies. They have seen it too.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service