Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on June 21, 2009 at 8:08

TOG. Reported where on this site?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The Old Goat on June 21, 2009 at 13:29

Reply by w.r. frank on June 19, 2009 at 9:04am
SONRIS just reported potential on #239,163, ERH Ltd. at 20.765 mmcfd in 25, 13N, 11W.

I am merely trying to substantiate this comment. I cannot find this info on Sonris.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on June 21, 2009 at 14:45

WELL ALLOWABLES
EFFECTIVE DATE END DATE LUW CODE LUW TYPE CODE ALLOWABLE ESTIMATED POTENTIAL CURRENT ALLOWABLE TYPE
07/01/2009 12/31/2009 20765 20765 3
06/04/2009 06/30/2009 20765 20765 3
LEASE\UNIT\WELL PRODUCTION

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on June 21, 2009 at 14:10

Have you asked w. r. frank the source of his information? Just click on his name at the top of one of his posts or click "Ya'll" at the top of the page and use the search box to find his link.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by w.r. frank on June 21, 2009 at 16:17

I DID NOT say it had been completed and was producing 20.8 mmcfd. I said it had been reported on SONRIS as "potentialed" at 20.765 mmcfd. Which means it has been TESTED and an allowable has been applied for, which is a prerequisite for connecting to a pipeline and producing the well. I suggest you read more carefully before you accuse me of "making up facts."

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on June 21, 2009 at 16:55

TOG/Skip, why are we making this so difficult? On Sonris Lite, under "Wells by Section, Township and Range", for # 239163, there is a black and white report stating that the well potential is 20,765,000 cu ft and there is an allowable established of 20,765,000 cu ft. w.r. frank reported it accurately several days ago and I verified it as accurate from sonris before bringing it to Les B.'s attention. In an abundance of caution, Les B has decided to wait awhile before adding it to his list. It's his list, so it's his choice, but I believe we have well # 22 on the Hall of Fame list! No one is "making up" anything. I repeat what I said to you in a post a few days ago.........Great discovery, w.r.! Way to pay attention! I can assure you, I appreciate your info!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by w.r. frank on June 22, 2009 at 1:18

Subtle? Words mean something!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The Old Goat on June 22, 2009 at 3:20

My apologies to all concerned, I was only trying to verify the potential of this well and did not know where to look as the scout reports I read did not include this information.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on June 22, 2009 at 3:52

TOG. Many times the well profile does include the Well Potential/Allowable (same as the IP) when the Scout Report does not show it. You just have to know where to look and remember to do so when you review the data. Apology accepted but a less belligerent tone will go a long way toward getting the information you need.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by w.r. frank on June 22, 2009 at 6:57

Apology accepted. We are all trying to help each other on this site with as much relavent, accurate data as possible. BUT we are all learning and make mistakes.

But we should try to respect the messenger and we should try to learn ow to use the public data sources such as SONRIS ( I know it is sometimes confusing).

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 5
• 6
• 7
• Next ›
• Page