Steve P's Discussions (588)

View

Discussions Replied To (543)	Replies	Latest Activity
Oil & Gas Pro "Hopeful: My financial and general interests are far more aligned with NG as a commo…" Steve P replied May 26, 2012 to Big Changes Coming at Chesapeake	52	Jun 8, 2012 Reply by ShaleGeo
Oil & Gas Pro "The letter is excellent, timely, and necessary. Chesapeake's Board was hand-selecte…" Steve P replied May 26, 2012 to Big Changes Coming at Chesapeake	52	Jun 8, 2012 Reply by ShaleGeo
"Good faith is not exactly the issue, but if the mineral owner drills a well that is…" Steve P replied Apr 23, 2012 to Exxon Mineral Servitude	19	Apr 25, 2012 Reply by The_Baron
Oil & Gas Pro "Being both an engineer and an attorney, impossible is a term I seldom use. But I am…" Steve P replied Apr 14, 2012 to Saturday morning indoctrination	52	May 9, 2012 Reply by William C. Morrison
Oil & Gas Pro "the cartoon graphic of the chemicals flowing right through the rocks up towards a la…" Steve P replied Apr 14, 2012 to Saturday morning indoctrination	52	May 9, 2012 Reply by William C. Morrison
Oil & Gas Pro "The NY Times tends to write long, comprehensive articles. this was a very good arti…" Steve P replied Apr 10, 2012 to NATURAL GAS SIGNALS A ‘MANUFACTURING RENAISSANCE’ -New York Times	8	Apr 13, 2012 Reply by cocodrie man
"Not a good analogy. when a landowner (or a mineral owner) grants a mortgage to a ba…" Steve P replied Apr 9, 2012 to Mortgaging Stakes in Leases	9	Apr 9, 2012 Reply by sesport II
"very interesting case. It clearly could have gone either way. Interesting that bot…" Steve P replied Apr 2, 2012 to Landmark decision by Louisiana Supreme Court on March 31, 2012	10	Apr 4, 2012 Reply by DrWAVeSport Cd1
"Several of the producers are doing just that - 8 wells drilled sequentially, all com…" Steve P replied Feb 5, 2012 to Shale Gas $100 Billion Savings to U.S. Exceed Tax Cuts (Bloomberg Businessweek 01.26.12)	12	Feb 6, 2012 Reply by sesport II
landowner "I guess my point is that people are trying to buy now when the market is low, but th…" Steve P replied Feb 4, 2012 to CHK wants our interest	10	Feb 6, 2012 Reply by DrWAVeSport Cd1

‹ Previous
1
…
47
48
49
50
51
…
55
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.