Frederick O. Humke's Discussions (9)

Discussions Replied To (9) Replies Latest Activity

"From what I have read, Chesapeake is intentionally suppressing some production this…"

Frederick O. Humke replied Apr 11, 2009 to Royalties

152 Apr 13, 2009
Reply by sesport

"In Jan was 7.55/MCF, Feb 8.04, Mar 9.00, Apr 9.732, May 10.848, Jun 12.243, Jul 11.0…"

Frederick O. Humke replied Apr 11, 2009 to Royalties

152 Apr 13, 2009
Reply by sesport

"I was under the impression that these shale wells were periodically rejuvinated by t…"

Frederick O. Humke replied Mar 30, 2009 to Royalties

152 Apr 13, 2009
Reply by sesport

"In Feb 2008 the total volume was 87856.00 MCF, in March 2008 the total volume was 81…"

Frederick O. Humke replied Mar 30, 2009 to Royalties

152 Apr 13, 2009
Reply by sesport

"40acres out of the section and 20% royalty interest. I have rechecked the production…"

Frederick O. Humke replied Mar 24, 2009 to Royalties

152 Apr 13, 2009
Reply by sesport

"Started out early in 2008 at about $9000/month on Hays10-1 in Bienville Parish with…"

Frederick O. Humke replied Mar 24, 2009 to Royalties

152 Apr 13, 2009
Reply by sesport

"I would prefer Exxon because they are a U.S. company. But I would be concerned that…"

Frederick O. Humke replied Jan 26, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?

40 Jan 27, 2009
Reply by Les Bamburg

"We have been receiving royalty payments from Chesapeake starting about three months…"

Frederick O. Humke replied Dec 9, 2008 to Royalties

152 Apr 13, 2009
Reply by sesport

"Over two years ago I leased a 40 acre tract in Bienville parish to Chesapeake for ab…"

Frederick O. Humke replied Nov 2, 2008 to Did anyone sign a mineral lease in the shale for only a couple hundred per acre?

93 Nov 11, 2008
Reply by Guy Marsh

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service