Frederick O. Humke's Discussions (9)

View

Discussions Replied To (9)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "From what I have read, Chesapeake is intentionally suppressing some production this…" Frederick O. Humke replied Apr 11, 2009 to Royalties	152	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "In Jan was 7.55/MCF, Feb 8.04, Mar 9.00, Apr 9.732, May 10.848, Jun 12.243, Jul 11.0…" Frederick O. Humke replied Apr 11, 2009 to Royalties	152	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "I was under the impression that these shale wells were periodically rejuvinated by t…" Frederick O. Humke replied Mar 30, 2009 to Royalties	152	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "In Feb 2008 the total volume was 87856.00 MCF, in March 2008 the total volume was 81…" Frederick O. Humke replied Mar 30, 2009 to Royalties	152	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "40acres out of the section and 20% royalty interest. I have rechecked the production…" Frederick O. Humke replied Mar 24, 2009 to Royalties	152	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Started out early in 2008 at about $9000/month on Hays10-1 in Bienville Parish with…" Frederick O. Humke replied Mar 24, 2009 to Royalties	152	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "I would prefer Exxon because they are a U.S. company. But I would be concerned that…" Frederick O. Humke replied Jan 26, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "We have been receiving royalty payments from Chesapeake starting about three months…" Frederick O. Humke replied Dec 9, 2008 to Royalties	152	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by sesport
"Over two years ago I leased a 40 acre tract in Bienville parish to Chesapeake for ab…" Frederick O. Humke replied Nov 2, 2008 to Did anyone sign a mineral lease in the shale for only a couple hundred per acre?	93	Nov 11, 2008 Reply by Guy Marsh

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.