Search Results (699)

Discussions	Replies	Latest Activity
"My parents are in T16n, R11w, Sect. 10 in So. Hills near Forest Hills Elem. They als…" sesport replied Aug 26, 2008 to Got a letter today from Cajun Explorarion	3	Aug 26, 2008 Reply by Pat
landowner "Ken, yes - the various 3-D seismic shoots should provide insight into all formations…" Les Bamburg replied Jul 4, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
landowner "GHS Publisher, Keith Mauck, and I recently attended a conference in Washington regar…" Benjamin Hall replied Oct 10, 2012 to Radical Improvements to Fracking Efficiency?	3	Oct 11, 2012 Reply by Hopeful About Natural Gas
landowner "If I'm mistaken, seismic data cannot tell a geophysicist whether there is oil or gas…" Grillin' - MmmMmm replied Dec 13, 2009 to Oil...Oil...Oil...at 25,000 ft. in Shelby County, TX!	20	Dec 15, 2009 Reply by John D Cook
"There is a post in the Desoto Parish group discussing some of this. It appears that…" Parkdota replied Jan 23, 2010 to Bossier shale in 2010	30	Jan 25, 2010 Reply by ALongview
landowner "Seitel only needs mineral owner permission to acquire seismic data. However most sei…" Craig Cooper replied Jul 27, 2010 to Seismic Permit Question	23	Jul 31, 2010 Reply by Donna Thornton
landowner "Well, this really seems strange to get an ultimatum from a seismic testing company,…" benny688 replied Jan 19, 2011 to seismic exploration ultimatum	35	Jan 25, 2011 Reply by Linda Whatley
landowner "have not spoken in depth yet with landman im still waiting on a mineral lease offer…" KIM CASWELL replied Jul 27, 2008 to Pipeline right of ways	11	Jul 30, 2008 Reply by Ringgold Redskin
"BM, just realize faults vary in size (throw), depth and orientation. All these facto…" Les Bamburg replied Sep 13, 2010 to Fault Lines: Southern Part of the Play	44	Apr 14, 2011 Reply by lisette ann robinson
landowner "Thanks Les, but is there a way someone like myself can have a layman's interpretatio…" Natch N3 replied Jul 2, 2008 to (Flashback) BREAKING NEWS: Notes from Chesapeake's Conference Call	79	Mar 8, 2016 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant

‹ Previous
1
…
30
31
32
33
34
…
70
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.