Search Results (699)

Discussions	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "I think that is the standard offer for local seismic, but unless it is in North Boss…" Spring Branch,mineral owner replied Jun 14, 2009 to QUESTION ABOUT PROS AND CONS IN GIVING PERMISSION FOR SEISMIC TESTING	30	Apr 18, 2010 Reply by Explorer
Oil & Gas Pro "The large landowner has not signed for seismic in this section, would that prevent t…" nisie, not a happy camper landowner replied Nov 21, 2008 to Petrohawk says the 2008 Land Grab is over!	202	Dec 30, 2009 Reply by Cary Jerome Marston Huff
landowner "Does anyone know what the going rate for 3-D seismic work in the Haynsville Shale ar…" Les replied Jun 14, 2009 to Seismograph Work and Fee Rate	15	Jun 26, 2009 Reply by danny meyers
landowner "Ms. Conner, I can not answer your question as to colors. I suggest that you review…" Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant replied May 30, 2013 to question for Professionals about 3-D Seismic	24	Jun 12, 2013 Reply by Joe Aldridge
"Has there been any leasing &/or seismic activity in the Castor Area? T14N-R7W …" john goodday replied Feb 11, 2010 to Castor Area - Bienville Parish	0	Feb 11, 2010
landowner "I believe Shale Geo is correct, most/much of the 3D seismic being planned or acquire…" Craig Cooper replied Dec 2, 2008 to Seismic Question?	25	Jan 6, 2009 Reply by getoverit
Oil & Gas Pro "Is the problem that the seismic can not sufficiently define the parameters of the fa…" Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant replied Jan 24, 2011 to PETROHAWK UNIT APPLICATION TO DISSOLVE AND REFORM HA DRILLING UNITS TO ADDRESS FAULT	36	Jan 24, 2011 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
"Seismic survey results are proprietary. The 2009 seismic belongs to the company, or…" Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant replied Sep 22, 2012 to helicopters over section 9 desoto parish	8	Sep 25, 2012 Reply by JAMES SMITH
landowner "Another 2.7 quake today. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/seismicity/" Max replied May 20, 2012 to 3.7 Earthquake Northern Nacogdoches County	76	May 23, 2012 Reply by sesport II
landowner ""It's funny, but "damages" aren't a big concern, nor are "landowner concerns" a big…" Craig Cooper replied Jan 25, 2011 to seismic exploration ultimatum	35	Jan 25, 2011 Reply by Linda Whatley

‹ Previous
1
…
4
5
6
7
8
…
70
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
6	Request For Assistance
7	The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.