My guess is 240551 Brewer well in Bracky Branch.  Just a guess on my part though.
Jay

Views: 417

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Would be nice to know name. However, IMO, the important thing is the apparent successful experiment with a different completion technique to increase IP (and, hopefully, EUR) PER WELL. The 37 mmcfd. well used 20 frac stages!
Sounds like kind of frac jobs they are doing in North Dakota!
Where is this well located?
what township and range
Is this the biggest one yet in the play do you know
The name I would choose ..........MINE! LOL!
ALLMINE!
Oree, yes - this is by far the highest rate. But the well also had far more frac stages.
With some of the 6,000' - 8,000' laterals planned on many of the most recent permits in TX and LA, I would imagine seeing many more of these type of results in the future.
As you know, they can't. 5,280-330-330=4,620'

ECA put 20 frac stages closer together with more water and proppant.
D. Gaar..........6,000'-8,000' laterals may become commomplace in Texas, but they sure won't in Louisiana, as by now you are aware. Thanks for the help you give me in Shelby County.
If this is the well, the lateral is in Section 3, T13N-R10W.
BirdDawg, ever check your emails. No, not your site email, you're private one. LOL!

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service