I have not heard anything lately about drilling in sabine parish. I have 131 acres leased in sec6, t9w,r11w. They have drilled North of me Murry31 And South Olympia Well. Sunrise has no postings on either??????????.
Can someone tell me if drilling will continue in this area in 2009 or it has stoped.
Had high hopes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Views: 35

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Steve, currently there are no permitted Haynesville Shale wells in Sabine Parish but Shell has formed numerous units in your area so likely to change in the near future. This may depend on the amount of acreage already held by shallower production.
Thanks for your concern
Steve
Steve, CHK is drilling a horizontal West of the Murray well.
thank's very much for the information
steve
What do you want to Know?
Steve, my apologies for not including the following well that is currently drilling in my previous response. I was looking at permitted wells that had not yet spudded. Fortunately Two Dogs & DeSotoDude rectified by oversight.

Trinidad #109 Rig, Chesapeake, Nabors Logan 34 #H1 Well, Serial #238703, S34-T10N-R12W
I really appreciate your concern. It means alot to me and my family to get a response from someone who cares.
Again
Thanks alot
Steve
Trinidad just moved off the Nabors location. Rig is moving to Harper road south of Stanley. Chesapeake has a location surveyed and flagged off in the section next to me just north of Converse. I see on Sonris however that it is not permitted yet. I spoke to a Chesapeake employee a while back that stated they were working on settling for damages where the entrance road will go.
For what this may be worth to you Steve, we just leased our shallow rights in Sabine, 2 miles south from Oak Grove. It was about 275 acres. We're still awaiting, like many, for an offer for our deep rights. No info on drilling though. At least you are leased!
Proverbs --
Who was the lease with, if you don't mind sharing? I have friends with land around the Sardus (sp) area (just an intersection now) they got shallow lease offers from a lands man -- $200/acre -- they turned him down -- the landsman was playing it pretty close, no details who he was representing. They thought it a bit strange -- he was willing to lease any and all the land in the area, but didn't seem concerned about assembling a controlling interest in any of the sections.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service