landowner

Two Great New Wells in RR and Encouraging Well in North (18N)

Sonris today reports potential on three HK wells. Two in RR: Sample 5(#238,488), in 5, 14N, 11W at 18.5 mmcfd; and Jacobs 36 (#238,489) in 36, 14N, 11W at 15.5 mmcfd.

An encouraging sign for the northern sector is the potential filed for Crestview 28 (#238,490) in 28, 18N, 16W at 10.001 mmcfd.

Views: 48

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


landownerPermalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on June 11, 2009 at 13:27
good news. I went ahead and categorized it for you...

landownerPermalink Reply by RAY on June 11, 2009 at 15:20
a breath of fresh gas!

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on June 11, 2009 at 15:21
Thanks, wr. HK's Crestview Woods 28 is welcome news for an area of the play that could use some good news.

landownerPermalink Reply by sesport on June 11, 2009 at 16:03
With S5 being in the northern area and S36 being in the southern, sounds like 14N, 11W is full of gas! Good for them, hopefully they will see results through economic impacts.

Thanks for the update - sesport :0)

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on June 11, 2009 at 16:04
WR, thanks for the heads up on the wells. By the way the Jacobs 36 #1 tested at 17.5 MMcfd.

The Crestview well is the 1st to crack 10 MMcfd in T18N. This well plus the Exco Sharp well shows the better operators are getting a handle on the northern portion of the play.

landownerPermalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on June 11, 2009 at 18:26
For what it's worth, the Jacobs 36 #1 is in 13/11, not 14/11. Also the Jacobs 36 #2 has been drilled and fraced and should have an IP reported any day now. I never can figure out what rational the operators have for drilling two Haynesville wells in the same sections when there are so many sections still undrilled. Your thoughts, Les?

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on June 12, 2009 at 7:51
SB, I chalk it up to science. They may want to try two different well and/or completion designs in the same area to compare results.

landownerPermalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on June 12, 2009 at 8:51
Sounds reasonable to me. Hope they'll do some "science" in my sections.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on June 12, 2009 at 11:31
SHE BLINDED ME WITH SCIENCE
THOMAS DOLBY

It's poetry in motion
she turned her tender eyes to me
as deep as any ocean
as sweet as any harmony
mm - but she blinded me with science
"she blinded me with science!"
and failed me in biology

It's poetry in motion
and now she's making love to me
the spheres're in commotion
the elements in harmony
she blinded me with science
"she blinded me with science!"
and hit me with technology

landownerPermalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on June 12, 2009 at 13:01
You go, LES!

landownerPermalink Reply by w.r. frank on June 12, 2009 at 3:01
Typing to quickly. Jacobs is, in fact, in 13N, not 14, AND it was 17.5 mmcfd, not 15.5.

Not proofing is a bad habit in my old age.

RSS

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service