Rapides Parish

Information

Rapides Parish

All things pertaining to leasing, drilling and production in Rapides Parish. 

 

Members: 102
Latest Activity: Mar 14

Discussion Forum

CROWELL LM 3 252119 vs 220535 42 Replies

On this well are they going back in the 220535 or is it a new drill just at same location?Continue

Started by Lisa Melder-Johnson. Last reply by Skip Peel - Independent Landman Mar 14.

RAPIDES PARISH CROWELL WELL HAS NEW SERIAL NUMBER 180 Replies

Looks like there has been a new Permit issued for Crowell well SW of Glenmora.   Was SN# 251311 & now it is SN# 251809.Continue

Started by Lisa Melder-Johnson. Last reply by Skip Peel - Independent Landman Feb 13.

SAExploration working in area now 3 Replies

SAExploration's is working in the area between Forest Hill and Melder today.  Crew with drill buggy and water truck.  SAExploration is the one who is permitted to do the 500+ square mile 3D seismic survey for CGG.Continue

Started by Lisa Melder-Johnson. Last reply by Rock Man Sep 15, 2019.

SAExploration working in area now

SAExploration's is working in the area between Forest Hill and Melder today.  Crew with drill buggy and water truck.  SAExploration is the one who is permitted to do the 500+ square mile 3D seismic survey for CGG.Continue

Started by Lisa Melder-Johnson Sep 14, 2019.

Seismic Systems Inc working in local area 14 Replies

Yesterday a company by the name of SSI (white suv) was working in my area Saturday.  Could they be contracted to do part of the 3D survey.  I see only work in Louisiana thata they worked on was ih n Delhi and was 4D?  First I heard of 4D.Continue

Started by Lisa Melder-Johnson. Last reply by Lisa Melder-Johnson Sep 3, 2019.

Fredericksburg Shelf vs new 3D Shoot 1 Reply

Does anyone have a map or know were the Fredericksburg Shelf area falls within this new 3D Box or Marathon Acreage Box on Amelia Resources Blog?Continue

Started by Lisa Melder-Johnson. Last reply by Rock Man Jul 18, 2019.

Rapides Parish, companies interested 3 Replies

With EOG, ConocoPhillips & Marathon eyeing this AUS C, could Masters Creek be next in lease scope? I'm in AUS C SU57.

Started by Lisa Melder-Johnson. Last reply by Rock Man Aug 26, 2018.

New Leasing activity in Rapides Parish? 92 Replies

Has anyone heard about some landmen looking to start up new TMS leases in Rapides Parish?

Started by Randall. Last reply by Two Dogs, Pirate Jun 10, 2018.

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Rapides Parish to add comments!

Comment by David Crockett on December 7, 2018 at 1:03pm

Crowell lm 30 number 251311 latest info on sonris posted dec 4:

well status 5    12/2/18 tested Cameron Bop’s to 250 psi low and 10000 psi high for 30 mins, test ok 12/4/18, drilling curve @ 15026

Comment by Rock Man on November 21, 2018 at 11:16am

Jay, thanks for comment / update. .

Comment by David Crockett on November 21, 2018 at 6:50am

850 feet is a long way

Comment by Rock Man on November 20, 2018 at 10:23pm

On Crowell, last week they were fishing for stuck pipe at 15.933' -now washing and reaming hole 850' shallower in the wellbore. Without knowing details, it is possible that they did not "unstick" the drill pipe and had to back off and leave fish in hole. Or they got the pipe unstuck, drilled to TD, logged the hole and are now getting ready to plug back and start drilling the lateral.

These weekly reports are great, but they do a lot to the imagination (especially in a situation like this one).

Comment by Skip Peel - Independent Landman on November 20, 2018 at 3:34pm

Wash & Ream - conditioning the wellbore

Comment by David Crockett on November 20, 2018 at 3:26pm

I see the Crowell LM30 well #251311 was updated today.  It says w & r @ 15,072’. 

Comment by Rock Man on November 14, 2018 at 10:55pm

Operator may go deeper or shallower than permitted depth. All depends on when they well through target ( assuming base of AC) and then getting 100-150' of rat hole so that the section can be logged and entire section evaluated.

Comment by David Crockett on November 14, 2018 at 6:57pm

So they only lacked 15 feet getting to the vertical depth that they wanted before getting stuck. Is that correct?  Then it looks like they had only planned to go an additional 57 feet. Am I correct?  Is that unusual?

Comment by Rock Man on November 14, 2018 at 4:42pm

Jay, thanks - I should have figured that this was still pilot hole part of program / my error. Even more a concern that they are stuck in vertical hole.

Comment by Rock Man on November 14, 2018 at 4:13pm

David, thanks for the Crowell update. Not encouraging seeing them having to deal with stuck drill pipe only about 1000' below intermediate casing shoe. I figure this puts the wellbore either in the lower part of the curve or at a horizontal position in the AC target zone. Also assuming the operator is using oil based mud to limit such problems.

 

Members (102)

 
 
 

© 2020   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service