Started this discussion. Last reply by Martin Sep 4, 2009.
Started this discussion. Last reply by herefordsnshale Apr 3, 2009.
Started this discussion. Last reply by herefordsnshale Mar 27, 2009.
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Comment Wall (41 comments)
You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!
Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com
JRV and I will be out with out Teryx Sun morning to ride our trails on the property. If you see us (White pickup King ranch and flatbed give us a shout. Thanks.LLV
J & L
Despite all the efforts of most of the decent, sincere people in Section 20 pointing out that it is simply not FAIR to the mineral owners of that section to decrease their revenue stream by putting 29 in with 20, and that there IS ample acreage in 29 for a well site, the Commish did exactly that "on the spot".
No one HAS YET been able to come up with an explanation of just how the well in the S/E corner of 20 is going to " . . . economically and efficiently . . . " drain gas in 29 when THE LATERAL GOES DIRECTLY NORTH AWAY FROM 29 !
Good ole Louisiana politics ! "Dem dat gots the gold -- makes de rules !"
In short -- the fix was in befort the sun came up on the Hearing day !!
You and your wife need to join us for some bowling.
View All Comments