My lease is HBP, so shouldn’t new wells have the same royalty?

Unfortunately for me, my inherited mineral lease (without a Pugh Clause) is held by production by a previous oil well. So, it is my understanding that I’m locked into the royalty of the original lease when a new producing well comes in. But, I got my division order for my new Haynesville Shale well and it is apparent that only a 1/20th (5%) royalty was used for the decimal interest calculation – way lower than the original royalty! Can anyone explain why this would happen?

Views: 235

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

No, not without reading all of your lease language and other title documents. It could easily be you are missing something. Go see an oil and gas lawyer.
Could the unit be larger on your Haynesville Shale well?

The acreage of the new Haynesville Shale unit is taken into account along with my property acreage. The other factor left in the calculation of the decimal interest is the royalty. To derive the decimal interest proposed in my division order, a royalty of only 1/20th (5%) was used.

Actually, forget the lawyer for now, call the paying company and ask them to explain the calculation.

I called them this afternoon. I finally got in touch with a real person after several minutes of menu diving and waiting on hold. This person did not have a clue as to why the decimal interest of the DO they sent to me was so far off. He tried to pull up a spreadsheet used for the decimal interest calculation, but he could not find it. He said he would have to “kick it up to an analyst” who would call me back later.

Varice,

Some people, who leased to CHK, receive 20% of their payment from Plains and 80% from CHK under the Joint Venture agreement of 2008.  I don't know if this applies to you or not.  These people signed a lease with CHK, but under terms of the JV, CHK sold 20% of their holdings to Plains.  So these people receive checks from two different companies each month.  This might explain why you get a 5% royalty from one company (is it Plains?), and you might soon receive the other 20% royalty from CHK.

Henry,  I just saw  in Desoto Records that Chesapeake is selling percentages in some wells to a company named Larchmont. Had not seen any sales to this company before. Saw the Plains
larchmont is owed by the ceo of chesapeake audrey mcclendon
Aubrey has a participation agreement in his employment contract that allows him to purchase a 2.5% interest in any and all wells drilled by the corporation.
interesting. This name is showing up just recently in Desoto records as owning percentages of wells
It is Aubrey McClendon's private company, he is CEO of Chesapeake. He has a sweetheart deal. Of course, he is not immune to making monumental mistakes.
Henry, if the lady has an old lease that is HBP and doesn't have a Pugh Clause, you can bet it is not a quarter royalty lease.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service