As was reported here on this site several months ago, the Secretary of the U S Department of Energy appointed a committee to look into the safety and environmental aspects of shale gas drilling and production in the US. The Subcommittee was charged with issuing a 90 day report, and it was released last week. The Subcommittee has made 4 basic recommendations, which are discussed in the Executive Summary. Here is a link to the report.
http://www.shalegas.energy.gov/resources/081111_90_day_report.pdf
I haven't read all of the report yet (it is 41 pages long) but apparently there is an opportunity for the public to comment on the report. Interestingly, the following quote is in the executive summary: The Subcommittee shares the prevailing view that the risk of fracturing fluid leakage into drinking water sources through fractures made in deep shale reservoirs is remote.
This is very significant to me because half of the subcommittee is from the environmental activist community. Overall, the subcommittee clearly emphasizes the importance of shale gas to the US economy.
Tags:
Thanks for posting this. it's good to read some good new for a change. It looks like the subcommittee had a range of technical folks. Over and over the report mentions the poor public relations job the industry has done - but it also comes down hard for disclosure of fracking chemicals. The overall thrust of it will be to move shale gas forward.
The report is fairly easy for novices like me to understand. Neither industry nor environmentalists will be totally satisfied with this report and I think that's a good thing. Here's an industry blog and an environmental one.
http://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2011/08/12/industry-group-c...
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/amall/doe_panel_finds_natural_gas...
i read it, and this is a good initial result, admittedly better than my cynical nature was willing to initially allow, but we'll see if this gets positive attention from the powers that be, or ignored like the recent economic commission.
i would only add, the natural gas industry has done a bad job at PR relative to what exactly, the various well established, highly organized and deep pocketed organizations that stand in the way? practically a given.
I'm in the process of reading the report but this caught my attention:
The challenges of protecting human health and the environment in
light of the anticipated rapid expansion of shale gas production require the joint efforts of
state and federal regulators. This means that resources dedicated to oversight of the
industry must be sufficient to do the job and that there is adequate regulatory staff at the
state and federal level with the technical expertise to issue, inspect, and enforce
regulations. Fees, royalty payments and severance taxes are appropriate sources of
funds to finance these needed regulatory activities.
"adequate staff" in government usually means redundancy. Paying 5 people to do what one could do efficiently.
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com