Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on July 6, 2020 at 14:10

I would caution to not get too excited about early post frac flow back results. There will be naturally a lot of high pressure due to the fluid volumes pumped with the frac. The early oil cut report is a positive but the key is what happens after post frac flowback rates stabilize and settle.

My biggest concern would be water influx with any O&G. As well as O&G volumes and decline over time.

The waiting game is tough since it takes so long for info to become official and posted

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on July 6, 2020 at 14:15

My cut-and-paste is the latest completion data for the subject well.  The only entry that is recent is this well test.

WELL TESTS

RPT TYP	TEST DATE	RPT DATE	OIL POT	COND	GAS DEL	WATER	BSW%	FLOW PRES	SHUTIN PRES	CHOKE	UPPER PERF	LOWER PERF	BOT HOLE PRES
DT-1	04/16/2020	05/01/2020									19074	19136
DT-1	10/21/2019	11/01/2019		3	132	873		1196		28	19074	19136

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on July 6, 2020 at 14:38

This is the deeper Tuscaloosa Sand completion below the Austin Chalk / figure this zone must have died out or watered out to merit uphole move to the AC

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on July 6, 2020 at 14:39

It is the same well by SN.  Am I missing something?

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on July 6, 2020 at 14:43

This is the info that post dates the deeper Tuscaloosa SS work / completions. DJ had this in posting earlier tonight.

This shows the plug back from deeper Tuscaloosa SS perfs and setting bridge plug to allow for AC testing

L # 0128-20
03/03/2020
03/05/2021
PERFORATE
APPROVED
03/05/2020
19800
N

AUSTIN CHALK INV # 1209732
SET CIBP IN 3-1/2" TBG @ 18760' & DB 15' CMT ON TOP; PUNCH TBG HOLES @ 18598'-600'; PUMP/SPOT 300' CMT PLUG INSIDE ANNULUS & TBG F/18300'-18600'; CUT&PULL TBG F/18100'; INSTALL TWO 7-1/16" 15M FRAC VALVES; SET CIBP IN 7" CSG @ 18080' & DB 10' CMT ON

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on July 6, 2020 at 14:47

So, number nine?  Thanks.

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on July 6, 2020 at 14:49

yes

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page