Many have asked why the wells in the northern portion of the play are not as good. It appears that the porosity is the culprit. Note the PDF of the Goldco (Now Matador) E & L Development well.
Jay
ShaleGeo & Braveheart. What is the chance that a different completion profile would be more successful in the north Caddo portion of the shale? A different frac fluid or proppent for example. Possibly even a different reservoir. And as to thickness, It would be instructive, IMO, to discuss the difference between gross thickness and net thickness.
We have engineers on this site? LOL! Okay, Mmaarrkk, where ya at? I think that we need to advertise for a few more reservoir engineers and geologists. Not that we don't have some good ones (Thank you, Jay), it's just that a HS site can use a full compliment. I believe that we have a sufficient number of landmen at present? Ha!
Jay to me you are as good as it gets cause you have been here from the get go with a short vacation. If you want to ride with me for a day, I would be glad to have you on board. You have helped many on this site and I am sure they would say much ablidged Jay.
Jay, Would the lack of porosity in the northern sections have a detrimental effect on the pressure gradient. In other words would it seem to have less porosity and be less overpressured?