Replies to This Discussion

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on August 9, 2009 at 4:46

The following is supplemental information for the completed Haynesville Shale wells:

Questar, Hutchinson 10 #H1 Well, Serial #238997, S10-T15N-R12W, Caddo Parish, 9120 Mcfd, 20/64" Choke, 3350 psi Flowing Pressure

Chesapeake, Berry 24 #H1 Well, Serial #239611, S24-T15N-R15W, Caddo Parish, 9531 Mcfd, 16/64" Choke, 7200 psi Flowing Pressure

Chesapeake, Blackstone 25 #H1 Well, Serial #239083, S25-T11N-R15W, DeSoto Parish, 6097 Mcfd, 18/64" Choke, 5324 psi Flowing Pressure

Chesapeake, Frith 29 #H1 Well, Serial #239232, S29-T14N-R12W, DeSoto Parish, 13922 Mcfd, 18/64" Choke, 9147 psi Flowing Pressure

Chesapeake, Chesapeake Royalty 30 #H1 Well, Serial #239209, S30-T14N-R12W, DeSoto Parish, 16450 Mcfd, 20/64" Choke, 7300 psi Flowing Pressure

Chesapeake, Phillips Energy 1 #H1 Well, Serial #239571, S1-T14N-R15W, DeSoto Parish, 8977 Mcfd, 16/64" Choke, 7590 psi Flowing Pressure

Chesapeake, Peacock 13 #H1 Well, Serial #238618, S13-T15N-R15W, DeSoto Parish, 9468 Mcfd, 20/64" Choke, 4345 psi Flowing Pressure

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Scott on August 9, 2009 at 4:53

Les,

I notice some of these IP rates are substantially lower than others that have been reported. (Not saying they aren't great wells) However, is Chesapeake doing anything to limit the amount of gas produced due to low prices?

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on August 9, 2009 at 7:03

Scott, Chesapeake and others have stated they plan to "choke back" flow due to the pricing environment and some gathering/treating capacity limitations. This is evident by the smaller choke sizes and high flowing pressures for some wells.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Checkmateking on August 9, 2009 at 6:53

What is the point of reporting wells that have production numbers and pressures as N/A? They do this all the time in the Pine Island and Bellevue fields.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on August 9, 2009 at 7:05

CMK, I don't know why the newspaper omits these values as the pressure is available on the well potential test report.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on August 9, 2009 at 7:09

I've never asked that specific question but thought the n/a referred to less than one barrel per day. That level of production is not unusual in the shallow formations of the Caddo Pine Island Field.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Checkmateking on August 9, 2009 at 8:33

I have also seen IP reports of 1 BPD etc. and the first month's cumulative production will be 1000 barrels or more.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on August 9, 2009 at 8:46

That's good to know, Checkmateking. By LOC reports, you'd think operators in the Caddo Pine Island Field were there to produce water as the barrels of oil to H20 are often 1/250+.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Checkmateking on August 9, 2009 at 8:54

Having some production in the PIne Island field, this has always been the bane of oil wells there, but sometimes you'll get lucky I have seen a few Nacatoch and Chalk wells that could have made a man a millionaire many times over (going steady for 30+ years in some instances) too bad they are so damn lenticular.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on August 9, 2009 at 9:00

Look up Serial #503 on SONRIS. It was spud 2-21-1918. Three Sisters is still getting production.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Checkmateking on August 9, 2009 at 10:27

Wow Les, I am pretty good friends with some of the 3 sister's heirs, needless to say they have done very well.

I just looked at the well you mentioned, just mind numbing. One in a million there.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on August 9, 2009 at 10:43

LOL, CMK. It is always a pleasure to be confused with Les B.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page