Information

Arkansas Mineral Owners

All things pertaining to Oil & Natural Gas exploration in all South Arkansas Formations.

Location: South & Southwest Arkansas
Members: 239
Latest Activity: Jan 15, 2020

Discussion Forum

Dissolving the Chalybeat Springs Unit in Columbia Co., Ar. 5 Replies

Started by tony allen. Last reply by glyn allen gray Jan 15, 2020.

Sale of Bonanza Creek Energy to SandRidge Energy 1 Reply

Started by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Last reply by iwana nipper Nov 16, 2017.

Exploration in the Cotton Valley in the Atlanta Field of Columbia County 8 Replies

Started by obed w odom. Last reply by obed w odom Oct 11, 2014.

Pettet Well Is Permitted in 8-19S-18W of Columbia County 3 Replies

Started by obed w odom. Last reply by obed w odom Sep 19, 2014.

Haynesville formation application in Columbia Co. 12 Replies

Started by tony allen. Last reply by obed w odom Aug 28, 2014.

800 Leases filed in Miller County 21 Replies

Started by Rebecca Lane. Last reply by keith coburn Aug 11, 2014.

NEW PLAY IN LAFAYETTE COUNTY 36 Replies

Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by tony allen May 10, 2014.

Arkansas Fracking Regulations

Started by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) Nov 1, 2013.

Two proposed Cotton Valley horizontal wells in Dorcheat-Macedonia field of Columbia County 5 Replies

Started by obed w odom. Last reply by Oklahomachic Oct 7, 2013.

Selling Mineral Rights 12 Replies

Started by Lynda McCall. Last reply by Richard D. Reily Aug 7, 2012.

Lafeyette County Activity 13 Replies

Started by Pro Hobbs. Last reply by inthestix Aug 2, 2012.

What are "they" looking for in Miller County? 2 Replies

Started by Rebecca Lane. Last reply by Rebecca Lane Jun 13, 2012.

Force Integration - Arkansas?

Started by Rebecca Lane Jun 7, 2012.

What is happening with West Kelly Bayou Miller County? 1 Reply

Started by Rebecca Lane. Last reply by Rebecca Lane May 30, 2012.

Brammer well in western Columbia County. 22 Replies

Started by Mike McNeill. Last reply by Polly Ann Foote Oct 12, 2011.

field boundaries

Started by john w. parrish Sep 22, 2011.

Southwestern will start drilling Atlanta Field horizontal well Aug. 31 2 Replies

Started by Mike McNeill. Last reply by L Davis Aug 28, 2011.

Who's the man behind the Triad mask 21 Replies

Started by North LA. Last reply by FXEF Jul 29, 2011.

Ark. commission votes to shut down wells 3 Replies

Started by RAZORBACK. Last reply by The_Baron Jul 28, 2011.

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Arkansas Mineral Owners to add comments!

Comment by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 9, 2009 at 14:16
That's what we are here for. Just don't forget to thank Keith.
Comment by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 9, 2009 at 14:08
For companies that focus on the Gulf Coast region, it's not strange at all. And most non-LA. companies have accommodation addresses in B.R.
Comment by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 9, 2009 at 13:50
There is no operator listed on SONRIS with name Greystone. They are likely a land company taking leases for a client or as speculation. That would fit with your report of their leasehold compared to Stroud.

Name Type City Status
GREYSTONE OIL & GAS, LLP Partnership (Non-Louisiana) Active

Business: GREYSTONE OIL & GAS, LLP
Charter Number: 35802822 L
Registration Date: 10/26/2004 3:48:00 PM
Domicile Address
DOMICILE: DELAWARE
Mailing Address
C/O CGI TECH. & SOLUTIONS (IMAGING DEPT)
1225 N. LOOP W., STE. 525
HOUSTON, TX 77008
Principal Business Office
1616 SOUTH VOSS RD., STE. 400
HOUSTON, TX 77057
Registered Office in Louisiana



Principal Business Establishment in Louisiana
5615 CORPORATE BLVD., STE. 400B
BATON ROUGE, LA 70808
Status
Status: Active
Registered: 10/26/2004
Last Report Filed: 11/2/2009 12:45:04 PM
Type: Partnership (Non-Louisiana)

Registered Agent(s)
Agent: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM
Address 1: 5615 CORPORATE BLVD., STE. 400B
City, State, Zip: BATON ROUGE, LA 70808
Appointment Date: 10/26/2004



Officer(s) Additional Officers: No
Officer: MICHAEL A. GEFFERT
Title: General Partner
Address 1: 1616 SOUTH VOSS RD., STE. 400
City, State, Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77057



Amendments on File (1)
Description Date
Stmt of Chg or Chg Prin Bus Off 1/29/2008
Comment by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 9, 2009 at 13:42
There are numerous Greystone corporations with names that indicate that they do O&G business. To post some information, I need the full name as it appears on the leases.
Comment by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 8, 2009 at 12:30
From LA. Secretary of State and LOC SONRIS lite. 16 producing wells in 26 years seems to indicate that Stroud has conducted additional operations out of state. Most smaller operators have a few "Organization Red Flags" and I discount the importance of those for Stroud.

StroudPetroleumInc..pdf
Comment by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 8, 2009 at 11:45
Allen. I think we can help regarding some background on the companies. Have you turned up any information on the s-t-r where the leasing is taking place.
Comment by North LA on December 8, 2009 at 10:54
Greystone used to be a JV partner of CHK but I don't know if they still have a contract or not. They have been in southern Union parish for the last few years just poking holes in the ground. No production recorded. They drilled about 5 wells in the old Monroe field at depths consitent with the Smackover. Don't know what they are looking for but I hope they hit it big:) I'm guessing oil instead of gas.
Comment by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 7, 2009 at 16:25
Allen. That Borders is still executing and recording leases is a good sign. It doesn't guarantee development activity to follow but It does establish continuing interest. Can you share with us the other two companies recording leases? I suspect that the location of the leased minerals would also be of interest to some of the members.
Comment by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 7, 2009 at 15:53
Allen. Is E.O.G. ,or a land company representing them, continuing to record leases with the Clerk of Court?
Comment by Bill Meaney on December 7, 2009 at 3:59
This is a classic case of unjustified histeria. The success of the Haynesville has driven companies to look for other "resource plays." To make a resource play a big company (EOG, Borders is just a front) has to have lots of acreage tied up. That's what the investment community wants because they are preceived as "low" risk. In reality, although the Lower Smackover may have potential, it is definitely not proven. Even if it works somewhere, someday it may be no more "commerical" than some of the traditional South Arkansas plays. That's not a bad thing. It's a good thing...but people will have to readjust their expectations.
 

Members (239)

 
 
 

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service