Well Permit Pulled due to Walmart Objections

I do not know if this true, but I have heard that the A.T. Martinez well permit (Shuteye Rd in Many, LA) was pulled due to objections from Wal-Mart - and there will be a hearing - if this is true what are other situations that could stop a well from being drilled?

Views: 48

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by j garrett on February 2, 2010 at 15:21
I think a Wal-Mart in Many might be a bigger story.....
Permalink Reply by Shaleeee on February 2, 2010 at 15:33
Maybe to you - but then some people feel the need to just have a say on a topic without contributing a anything of value.
Permalink Reply by RBT on February 3, 2010 at 3:30
Only speculating here, Shaleeee, but since Wal-Mart has become the new owner of record just recently, they may not have been initially served with a pre-app. notice.

Hopefully this is the case, and after having their say at a hearing, Wal-Mart maybe would not have any objections.
Permalink Reply by William E Lafitte III on February 3, 2010 at 3:33
I own forty acres in this unit and have not received notification of a new hearing(should I?).
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 15, 2010 at 18:13
William,

Lafitte Farms?
Permalink Reply by William E Lafitte III on February 16, 2010 at 2:20
yes
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 16, 2010 at 3:49
William, I believe you should be notified once a new unit application is made for your section but you may want to check the hearing schedule on Sonris for anything related to the Pendleton-Many Field.
Permalink Reply by FXEF on February 14, 2010 at 16:28
They don't have hearings for well permits, only have hearings for unit order applications. Has a well permit been posted on SONRIS?
Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on February 14, 2010 at 17:27
With a section, towmship and range it is pretty easy to check out!
Permalink Reply by Shaleeee on February 15, 2010 at 4:14
I have attempted to find the original thread on this subject to no avail but I think it is S20 - T7 R11W
Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 15, 2010 at 4:56
Ask Les B, Shaleee. He posted the thread and the last comment was that he thought he should pull it because the application was withdrawn. The section may have been 22.
Permalink Reply by Shaleeee on February 15, 2010 at 15:23
Thanks jffree1 - I am going to let this drop - I should not have started the topic without fully understanding the situation - as I said it was only hearsay - what I really was interested in was what situations could cause an (application) to be withdrawn and can there be objections from interested parties that could put a halt on a well being drilled?

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Top Content 

1 Looking Back At The Haynesville Shale - A Retrospective

Looking Back At The Haynesville Shale - A Retrospective
2 Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings

Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings
3 Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play

Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play
4 Aethon looks for Buyers of its Haynesville Assets

Aethon looks for Buyers of its Haynesville Assets
5 Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.

Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.
6 Comstock October Presentation

Comstock October Presentation
7 Haynesville Has 12.5 Years of Sub-$3 NatGas Inventory - Enverus

Haynesville Has 12.5 Years of Sub-$3 NatGas Inventory - Enverus

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service