Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on Monday

Absolutely, Ryan.  Good visual.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Hale Yayuh on Monday

Yes, good work.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ryan Howrish on Monday

Sounds good. If there is interest, I will publish an update every couple of weeks and see how it goes.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on Monday

Thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Quattro 23 hours ago

I think this is great info and would be appreciated.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant 5 hours ago

Some may recall that I posted a weekly "snapshot of the play" that tracked where Haynesville drilling and production units were being approved in the first year of the play.  I decided to stop posting it when it became obvious that a number of units were being applied for without any geologic justification as to the prospective nature of the shale in that unit location.  In some cases those applications appeared to be efforts to market development rights as opposed to indications of intent to drill HA wells.  A number of companies formed units that were never drilled.  In order to not give mineral owners expectations that were unlikely to be fulfilled, I chose to stop posting that discussion thread.  Now, sixteen years later, I think the economic Haynesville Shale footprint is well established although there are minor step out applications for units that may or may not be drilled.  That particularly applies to HA units in the Zwolle Field by GEPH II and Ensight IV.  If any of those three units have wells drilled, I'll post it.

• ▶ Reply